PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CW vs. HII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CW vs. HII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc (HII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 37.55% return, which is significantly higher than HII's -11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed HII with an annualized return of 25.12%, while HII has yielded a comparatively lower 8.50% annualized return.


CW

1D
0.10%
1M
0.93%
YTD
37.55%
6M
38.99%
1Y
60.13%
3Y*
63.08%
5Y*
43.15%
10Y*
25.12%

HII

1D
-1.09%
1M
-10.55%
YTD
-11.81%
6M
-8.27%
1Y
32.12%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CW vs. HII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
37.55%55.66%59.73%33.98%21.03%19.86%-16.83%38.70%-15.79%24.56%
HII
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc
-11.81%84.17%-25.67%15.16%26.33%12.11%-30.46%34.00%-18.21%29.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CW and HII is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2011

0.55

The correlation between CW and HII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CW:

$28.09B

HII:

$11.70B

EPS

CW:

$13.64

HII:

$15.37

PE Ratio

CW:

55.58

HII:

19.37

PEG Ratio

CW:

3.03

HII:

4.51

PS Ratio

CW:

7.88

HII:

0.91

PB Ratio

CW:

10.67

HII:

2.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

CW:

$3.61B

HII:

$12.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CW:

$1.34B

HII:

$3.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

CW:

$745.31M

HII:

$1.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CW vs. HII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CW
CW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HII
HII Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HII Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HII Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HII Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CW vs. HII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc (HII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWHIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

0.89

+3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

2.67

+10.86

CW vs. HII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CW Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the HII Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CW and HII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CW vs. HII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, which is greater than HII's maximum drawdown of -49.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and HII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWHIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.19%

-49.70%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

-36.35%

+23.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.21%

-45.21%

+18.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.21%

-45.21%

+18.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.73%

-49.70%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-34.11%

+34.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.89%

-13.68%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

12.07%

-7.61%

Volatility

CW vs. HII - Volatility Comparison

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a higher volatility of 10.40% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc (HII) at 9.30%. This indicates that CW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWHIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.40%

9.30%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.00%

29.33%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.95%

35.01%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.89%

31.20%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.31%

30.61%

-0.30%

Dividends

CW vs. HII - Dividend Comparison

CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than HII's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.13%0.17%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%
HII
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc
1.84%1.60%2.78%1.93%2.07%2.46%2.48%1.44%1.59%1.07%1.14%1.34%

Financials

CW vs. HII - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
913.69M
3.10B
(CW) Total Revenue
(HII) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CW vs. HII - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
36.3%
69.3%
Portfolio components
CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

HII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc reported a gross profit of 2.15B and revenue of 3.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

HII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc reported an operating income of 155.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.

HII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc reported a net income of 149.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CW and HII have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CW has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to HII (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs HII's -49.70%.

CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CW and HII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer