CW vs. BRO
CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) and BRO (Brown & Brown, Inc.) are both stocks. CW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while BRO operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CW returned 25.25%/yr vs 13.77%/yr for BRO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CW vs. BRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 38.43% return, which is significantly higher than BRO's -25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed BRO with an annualized return of 25.25%, while BRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.77% annualized return.
CW
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 38.43%
- 6M
- 39.42%
- 1Y
- 61.45%
- 3Y*
- 63.27%
- 5Y*
- 43.89%
- 10Y*
- 25.25%
BRO
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- -25.23%
- 6M
- -27.62%
- 1Y
- -43.90%
- 3Y*
- -2.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.77%
CW vs. BRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 38.43% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. | -25.23% | -21.37% | 44.32% | 25.73% | -18.39% | 49.31% | 21.06% | 44.67% | 8.30% | 16.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and BRO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1992 | 0.31 |
The correlation between CW and BRO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CW:
$13.64
BRO:
$4.76
CW:
55.91
BRO:
12.44
CW:
3.05
BRO:
0.91
CW:
7.92
BRO:
2.22
CW:
$3.61B
BRO:
$6.43B
CW:
$1.34B
BRO:
$3.82B
CW:
$745.31M
BRO:
$1.51B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CW vs. BRO — Risk / Return Rank
CW
BRO
CW vs. BRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CW | BRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.71 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.76 | -0.87 | +5.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.83 | -1.45 | +15.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CW vs. BRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, which is greater than BRO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and BRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CW | BRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.19% | -55.85% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -50.55% | +37.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | -55.85% | +28.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -55.85% | +28.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.73% | -55.85% | +7.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -51.87% | +51.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -13.54% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 30.26% | -25.80% |
Volatility
CW vs. BRO - Volatility Comparison
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) at 8.51%. This indicates that CW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CW | BRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.42% | 8.51% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.90% | 21.83% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.02% | 28.43% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.89% | 24.83% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.32% | 23.71% | +6.61% |
Dividends
CW vs. BRO - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than BRO's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. | 1.09% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.74% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.41% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
Financials
CW vs. BRO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Brown & Brown, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CW vs. BRO - Profitability Comparison
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
BRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
BRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
BRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a net income of 426.00M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CW and BRO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CW has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to BRO (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs BRO's -55.85%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CW and BRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer