CVY vs. POEAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX).
CVY is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index. It was launched on Sep 21, 2006. POEAX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Dec 30, 2003.
Performance
CVY vs. POEAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CVY vs. POEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 1.96% | 11.00% | 10.28% | 17.87% | -9.27% | 25.31% | -10.56% | 25.97% | -10.77% | 15.91% |
POEAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth | -1.83% | 16.66% | 15.13% | 18.53% | -21.24% | 18.82% | 16.09% | 26.91% | -9.28% | 19.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVY achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than POEAX's -1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CVY has underperformed POEAX with an annualized return of 8.29%, while POEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
CVY
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 10.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
POEAX
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 17.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CVY vs. POEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than POEAX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CVY vs. POEAX — Risk / Return Rank
CVY
POEAX
CVY vs. POEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVY | POEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.08 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.62 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.55 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 7.46 | -3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVY | POEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.08 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.25 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.36 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between CVY and POEAX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CVY vs. POEAX - Dividend Comparison
CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than POEAX's 7.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 3.96% | 3.99% | 4.07% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 2.37% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 4.44% | 3.94% | 4.50% | 5.89% |
POEAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth | 7.87% | 7.73% | 2.12% | 1.67% | 36.10% | 10.62% | 3.32% | 7.91% | 24.81% | 4.03% | 7.09% | 3.16% |
Drawdowns
CVY vs. POEAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than POEAX's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and POEAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVY | POEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -57.49% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.22% | -11.79% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.58% | -29.40% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.47% | -35.88% | -14.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.19% | -6.04% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -8.87% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.45% | +0.71% |
Volatility
CVY vs. POEAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) is 3.66%, while Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that CVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CVY | POEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 5.59% | -1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 9.30% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 16.91% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 25.08% | -8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 21.54% | -1.97% |