CVY vs. CLSM
CVY (Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF) and CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVY is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index, while CLSM is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVY returned 15.33%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for CLSM. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVY charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for CLSM.
Performance
CVY vs. CLSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVY achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than CLSM's 20.45% return.
CVY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 8.13%
- 1Y
- 17.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
CLSM
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 9.23%
- YTD
- 20.45%
- 6M
- 20.19%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVY vs. CLSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 7.59% | 11.00% | 10.28% | 17.87% | -9.27% | 3.44% |
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF | 20.45% | 15.32% | 1.87% | 3.78% | -23.23% | 9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVY and CLSM is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between CVY and CLSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
CVY vs. CLSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVY
CLSM
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
CVY
CLSM
Energy
CVY
CLSM
Real Estate
CVY
CLSM
Technology
CVY
CLSM
Consumer Cyclical
CVY
CLSM
Industrials
CVY
CLSM
Healthcare
CVY
CLSM
Basic Materials
CVY
CLSM
Communication Services
CVY
CLSM
Consumer Defensive
CVY
CLSM
Utilities
CVY
CLSM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVY vs. CLSM — Risk / Return Rank
CVY
CLSM
CVY vs. CLSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVY | CLSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 2.71 | -1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 3.58 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.50 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 4.04 | -1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 16.72 | -8.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVY | CLSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.71 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.35 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
CVY vs. CLSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than CLSM's maximum drawdown of -27.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and CLSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVY | CLSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -27.77% | -39.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | -8.50% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | -14.60% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.38% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -16.49% | +6.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.05% | +0.16% |
Volatility
CVY vs. CLSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) is 2.87%, while Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that CVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVY | CLSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 3.58% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 10.54% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 12.70% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 12.47% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 12.47% | +7.09% |
CVY vs. CLSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CLSM's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVY vs. CLSM - Dividend Comparison
CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than CLSM's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF | 0.75% | 0.90% | 2.13% | 2.58% | 3.17% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 3.75% | 3.99% | 4.07% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 2.37% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 4.44% | 3.94% | 4.50% | 5.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVY and CLSM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLSM has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to CVY (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVY dropped -66.86% vs CLSM's -27.77%.
On 3-year performance, CVY leads with 15.33% vs 13.75% for CLSM. On fees, CLSM is cheaper at 0.82% per year. On volatility, CVY has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CVY has performed better with a 15.33% return vs 13.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CLSM is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.
CVY has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.75% for CLSM.
CVY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CLSM is Tactical Allocation. CVY tracks Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index, while CLSM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CVY and 0.82% for CLSM.
CLSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVY and CLSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer