CVSM vs. TNA
CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CVSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by CresAlta, while TNA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). CVSM is actively managed, while TNA is passively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CVSM charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.
Performance
CVSM vs. TNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CVSM
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TNA
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- 6M
- 24.74%
- YTD
- 51.72%
- 1Y
- 86.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- -3.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.96K | $58.28K | $38.43K | |
| $268.91M | $294.37M | $417.60M |
CVSM vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 5.73% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 14.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVSM and TNA is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVSM vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TNA
CVSM vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVSM | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVSM vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVSM drawdown since its inception was -3.36%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSM and TNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVSM | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -88.09% | +84.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -65.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -35.83% | +35.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.94% | -33.92% | +32.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.90% | — |
Volatility
CVSM vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVSM | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 57.68% | -46.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.20% | 67.19% | -55.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.20% | 68.35% | -57.15% |
CVSM vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVSM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVSM vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison
CVSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than TNA's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.31% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVSM and TNA have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CVSM is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CVSM is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.
TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
CVSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: CresAlta and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CVSM and 1.05% for TNA.
Find the right allocation for CVSM and TNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer