PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVSG.L vs. GS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CVSG.L vs. GS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in CVS Group plc (CVSG.L) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CVSG.L is traded in GBp, while GS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVSG.L achieves a -3.27% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 20.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CVSG.L has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 4.90%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 24.52% annualized return.


CVSG.L

1D
-1.19%
1M
9.14%
YTD
-3.27%
6M
2.31%
1Y
-2.90%
3Y*
-14.70%
5Y*
-10.37%
10Y*
4.90%

GS

1D
-4.34%
1M
13.41%
YTD
20.51%
6M
22.64%
1Y
77.94%
3Y*
46.98%
5Y*
26.03%
10Y*
24.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVSG.L vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVSG.L
CVS Group plc
-3.27%53.92%-49.68%-12.62%-13.26%49.55%31.18%74.01%-36.05%-5.32%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
20.51%45.48%54.69%10.11%3.08%49.01%14.00%35.13%-29.58%-1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CVSG.L and GS is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CVSG.L:

£890.05M

GS:

$319.91B

EPS

CVSG.L:

£0.46

GS:

$57.41

PE Ratio

CVSG.L:

26.83

GS:

18.09

PEG Ratio

CVSG.L:

0.48

GS:

2.34

PS Ratio

CVSG.L:

0.66

GS:

2.95

PB Ratio

CVSG.L:

3.02

GS:

2.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVSG.L:

£1.35B

GS:

$110.77B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVSG.L:

£528.30M

GS:

$61.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

CVSG.L:

£235.80M

GS:

$24.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVSG.L vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVSG.L
CVSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CVSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CVSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GS
GS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVSG.L vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVS Group plc (CVSG.L) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVSG.LGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.45

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

4.20

-4.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

13.19

-13.46

CVSG.L vs. GS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVSG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the GS Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVSG.L and GS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVSG.LGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

2.86

-2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.96

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.83

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.36

-0.09

Drawdowns

CVSG.L vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVSG.L drawdown since its inception was -75.04%, which is greater than GS's maximum drawdown of -70.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSG.L and GS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVSG.LGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.04%

-70.08%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.33%

-18.65%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.04%

-31.75%

-31.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.62%

-31.75%

-38.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.23%

-40.28%

-32.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.95%

-4.34%

-49.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-15.72%

-16.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.68%

5.93%

+4.75%

Volatility

CVSG.L vs. GS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CVS Group plc (CVSG.L) is 9.00%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that CVSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVSG.LGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

10.08%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.87%

22.29%

-4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.05%

27.43%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.63%

27.13%

+8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.98%

29.51%

+11.47%

Dividends

CVSG.L vs. GS - Dividend Comparison

CVSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than GS's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVSG.L
CVS Group plc
0.68%0.66%0.95%0.45%0.36%0.29%0.00%0.48%0.76%0.43%0.32%0.36%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.64%1.59%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%

Financials

CVSG.L vs. GS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVS Group plc and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B202120222023202420252026
356.90M
17.23B
(CVSG.L) Total Revenue
(GS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CVSG.L values in GBp, GS values in USD

CVSG.L vs. GS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CVS Group plc and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
40.6%
98.2%
Portfolio components
CVSG.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Group plc reported a gross profit of 144.90M and revenue of 356.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.6%.

GS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.91B and revenue of 17.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.

CVSG.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Group plc reported an operating income of 35.10M and revenue of 356.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

GS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.49B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.

CVSG.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Group plc reported a net income of 7.80M and revenue of 356.90M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

GS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 5.63B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CVSG.L and GS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVSG.L and GS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer