PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVS vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVS vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVS Health Corporation (CVS) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVS achieves a 14.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CVS has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 2.37%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.


CVS

1D
-1.24%
1M
9.03%
YTD
14.70%
6M
17.27%
1Y
45.87%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
2.37%

XLU

1D
1.86%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
3.55%
6M
1.36%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVS vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVS
CVS Health Corporation
14.70%84.35%-40.77%-12.53%-7.63%54.87%-5.14%17.26%-7.04%-5.75%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.55%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CVS and XLU is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.28

The correlation between CVS and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVS vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVS
CVS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVS vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVS Health Corporation (CVS) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVSXLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

0.68

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

1.01

+0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.13

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.11

+1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.06

2.52

+4.54

CVS vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVS and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVSXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

0.68

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.54

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.48

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.40

-0.07

Drawdowns

CVS vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVS drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVS and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVSXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.07%

-51.98%

-12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-9.18%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.98%

-17.26%

-26.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.79%

-25.26%

-31.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.79%

-36.07%

-20.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.78%

-7.38%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-10.22%

-9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.36%

4.07%

+2.29%

Volatility

CVS vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

CVS Health Corporation (CVS) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.41%. This indicates that CVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVSXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.91%

5.41%

+5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.02%

11.76%

+14.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.74%

14.56%

+16.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.90%

17.32%

+12.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.28%

19.26%

+10.02%

Dividends

CVS vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

CVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than XLU's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVS
CVS Health Corporation
2.97%3.35%5.93%3.06%2.36%1.94%2.93%2.69%3.05%2.76%2.15%1.43%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.71%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVS and XLU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVS has higher volatility (10.91%) compared to XLU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVS dropped -64.07% vs XLU's -51.98%.

CVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVS and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer