CVRT vs. PYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) and PYLD (PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos, while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CVRT returned 76.22% vs 7.40% for PYLD. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CVRT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.

Performance

CVRT vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRT achieves a 40.89% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 0.95% return.

CVRT

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 8.71%
• YTD: 40.89%
• 6M: 41.79%
• 1Y: 76.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PYLD

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 7.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVRT vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	40.89%	29.37%	13.23%	11.02%
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	0.95%	9.57%	7.69%	8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CVRT and PYLD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023	0.26

CVRT vs. PYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CVRT	PYLD
Technology	43.9%	-
Utilities	14.0%	-
Industrials	8.9%	-
Financial Services	8.2%	-
Healthcare	7.4%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-
Energy	2.4%	100.0%
Basic Materials	2.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

CVRT vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVRT

CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 66
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVRT vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVRT	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.57	2.42	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.32	3.56	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.48	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.91	2.29	+6.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.91	10.44	+24.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVRT vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRT Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRT and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVRT	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.57	2.42	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.84	2.04	-0.20

Drawdowns

CVRT vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRT drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRT and PYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVRT	PYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.71%	-4.52%	-16.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-3.25%	-5.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-0.44%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-0.65%	-2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	0.71%	+1.48%

Volatility

CVRT vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.24%. This indicates that CVRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVRT	PYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.64%	1.24%	+6.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.57%	2.50%	+15.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.47%	3.08%	+18.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	3.99%	+15.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	3.99%	+15.97%

CVRT vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVRT vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than PYLD's 6.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	1.43%	1.68%	1.49%	0.32%
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.30%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVRT and PYLD in my portfolio?

CVRT and PYLD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVRT or PYLD?

CVRT has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to PYLD (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRT dropped -20.71% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

Which ETF is better, CVRT or PYLD?

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 76.22% vs 7.40% for PYLD. On fees, PYLD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVRT or PYLD?

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 76.22% return vs 7.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVRT or PYLD?

PYLD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CVRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVRT or PYLD?

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 1.43% for CVRT.

What is the main difference between CVRT and PYLD?

CVRT is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CVRT and 0.55% for PYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.