PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVRT vs. CPRJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVRT vs. CPRJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPRJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRT achieves a 40.89% return, which is significantly higher than CPRJ's 2.94% return.


CVRT

1D
-1.21%
1M
8.71%
YTD
40.89%
6M
41.79%
1Y
76.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPRJ

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.47%
YTD
2.94%
6M
3.35%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVRT vs. CPRJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CVRT and CPRJ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.69

The correlation between CVRT and CPRJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVRT vs. CPRJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVRT
CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CPRJ
CPRJ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CPRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CPRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVRT vs. CPRJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPRJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVRTCPRJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.61

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.91

5.37

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.91

25.64

+9.27

CVRT vs. CPRJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRT Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the CPRJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRT and CPRJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVRTCPRJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57

2.41

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.84

1.31

+0.53

Drawdowns

CVRT vs. CPRJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRT drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, which is greater than CPRJ's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRT and CPRJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVRTCPRJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.71%

-6.25%

-14.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-1.79%

-6.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.09%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-0.88%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

0.38%

+1.81%

Volatility

CVRT vs. CPRJ - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPRJ) at 0.35%. This indicates that CVRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPRJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVRTCPRJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

0.35%

+7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.57%

1.63%

+15.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

4.16%

+17.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

5.13%

+14.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

5.13%

+14.83%

CVRT vs. CPRJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CVRT and CPRJ have an expense ratio of 0.69%.


Dividends

CVRT vs. CPRJ - Dividend Comparison

CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while CPRJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPRJ
Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
1.43%1.68%1.49%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVRT and CPRJ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVRT has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to CPRJ (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRT dropped -20.71% vs CPRJ's -6.25%.

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 76.22% vs 9.60% for CPRJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CPRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 76.22% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVRT and CPRJ have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

CVRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for CPRJ.

CVRT is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while CPRJ is Defined Outcome.

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVRT and CPRJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer