PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPRJ vs. CAIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPRJ vs. CAIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPRJ) and Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPRJ achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than CAIE's 7.94% return.


CPRJ

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.14%
6M
2.28%
YTD
3.12%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.87%

CAIE

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.22%
6M
6.59%
YTD
7.94%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.59M$16.27M$13.26M
$492.45K$690.59K$374.92K

CPRJ vs. CAIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPRJ and CAIE is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.63

The correlation between CPRJ and CAIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPRJ vs. CAIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPRJ
CPRJ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CPRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CPRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CAIE
CAIE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CAIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAIE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CAIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPRJ vs. CAIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPRJ) and Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPRJCAIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.26

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.37

2.19

+4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.23

9.25

+15.98

CPRJ vs. CAIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPRJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the CAIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPRJ and CAIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPRJ vs. CAIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRJ drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum CAIE drawdown of -7.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRJ and CAIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPRJCAIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-7.73%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

-7.73%

+6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-1.42%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-1.13%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

1.84%

-1.57%

Volatility

CPRJ vs. CAIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPRJ) is 0.73%, while Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that CPRJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPRJCAIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

3.11%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

8.39%

-6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

12.04%

-9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.99%

11.84%

-6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

11.84%

-6.85%

CPRJ vs. CAIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPRJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIE's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPRJ vs. CAIE - Dividend Comparison

CPRJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.57%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPRJ and CAIE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAIE has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to CPRJ (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRJ dropped -6.25% vs CAIE's -7.73%.

On 1-year performance, CAIE leads with 19.60% vs 7.00% for CPRJ. On fees, CPRJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CAIE has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPRJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for CAIE.

CAIE has the higher dividend yield at 13.13%, compared with 0.00% for CPRJ.

CPRJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CAIE is Derivative Income. CPRJ tracks MerQube Cap Protect US Small Cap PR Index - Jul, while CAIE tracks MerQube US Large Cap Vol Advantage Autocallable Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPRJ and 0.86% for CAIE.

CPRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPRJ and CAIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer