CVRT vs. CBXA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) and CBXA (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos, while CBXA is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index. CVRT is actively managed, while CBXA is passively managed. Over the past year, CVRT returned 50.02% vs -24.94% for CBXA. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CVRT vs. CBXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRT achieves a 27.81% return, which is significantly higher than CBXA's -20.47% return.

CVRT

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -1.56%
• 6M: 16.93%
• YTD: 27.81%
• 1Y: 50.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.67%

CBXA

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: -14.38%
• YTD: -20.47%
• 1Y: -24.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -9.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	$31.55K	$65.18K	$67.27K
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	$324.55K	$419.91K	$466.26K

CVRT vs. CBXA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	27.81%	46.11%
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	-20.47%	9.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CVRT and CBXA is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

CVRT vs. CBXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVRT

CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 83
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 84

CBXA

CBXA Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Omega Ratio Rank: 0
CBXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBXA Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVRT vs. CBXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVRT	CBXA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	-1.37	+3.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	-1.90	+4.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.77	+0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	-0.84	+4.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.05	-1.39	+13.44

CVRT vs. CBXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the CBXA Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRT and CBXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVRT vs. CBXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRT drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, smaller than the maximum CBXA drawdown of -29.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRT and CBXA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVRT	CBXA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.71%	-29.68%	+8.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.77%	-29.68%	+13.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.38%	-27.59%	+17.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-11.04%	+7.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	18.02%	-13.86%

Volatility

CVRT vs. CBXA - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA) at 3.06%. This indicates that CVRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVRT	CBXA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.94%	3.06%	+4.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.73%	13.29%	+6.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.06%	18.28%	+5.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	16.57%	+4.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.57%	16.57%	+4.00%

CVRT vs. CBXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CVRT and CBXA have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CVRT vs. CBXA - Dividend Comparison

CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than CBXA's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	2.48%	1.97%	0.00%	0.00%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	1.52%	1.68%	1.49%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVRT and CBXA in my portfolio?

CVRT and CBXA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVRT or CBXA?

CVRT has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to CBXA (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRT dropped -20.71% vs CBXA's -29.68%.

Which ETF is better, CVRT or CBXA?

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 50.02% vs -24.94% for CBXA. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CBXA has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVRT or CBXA?

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 50.02% return vs -24.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVRT or CBXA?

CVRT and CBXA have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVRT or CBXA?

CBXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.52% for CVRT.

What is the main difference between CVRT and CBXA?

CVRT is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while CBXA is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.