CBXA vs. SROI
CBXA (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) and SROI (Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBXA is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index, while SROI is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Calamos. CBXA is passively managed, while SROI is actively managed. Over the past year, CBXA returned -25.28% vs 19.56% for SROI. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CBXA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SROI.
Performance
CBXA vs. SROI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBXA achieves a -20.83% return, which is significantly lower than SROI's 11.11% return.
CBXA
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- 6M
- -18.90%
- YTD
- -20.83%
- 1Y
- -25.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.19%
SROI
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.82K | $66.75K | $66.82K | |
| $10.82K | $14.42K | $19.15K |
CBXA vs. SROI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | -20.83% | 9.67% |
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF | 11.11% | 26.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBXA and SROI is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBXA vs. SROI — Risk / Return Rank
CBXA
SROI
CBXA vs. SROI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA) and Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBXA | SROI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.23 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 1.82 | -2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | 7.54 | -8.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBXA vs. SROI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBXA drawdown since its inception was -29.68%, which is greater than SROI's maximum drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXA and SROI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBXA | SROI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.68% | -15.38% | -14.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.68% | -10.19% | -19.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.92% | -0.75% | -27.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -2.39% | -8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.94% | 2.45% | +15.49% |
Volatility
CBXA vs. SROI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA) is 3.14%, while Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that CBXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SROI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBXA | SROI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 4.13% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 12.24% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.25% | 14.55% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 14.04% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 14.04% | +2.55% |
CBXA vs. SROI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBXA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SROI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBXA vs. SROI - Dividend Comparison
CBXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than SROI's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | 2.49% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.68% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBXA and SROI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SROI has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to CBXA (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBXA dropped -29.68% vs SROI's -15.38%.
On 1-year performance, SROI leads with 19.56% vs -25.28% for CBXA. On fees, CBXA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBXA has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SROI has performed better with a 19.56% return vs -25.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CBXA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.
CBXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.54% for SROI.
CBXA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SROI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXA and 0.95% for SROI.
SROI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBXA and SROI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer