PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVRD vs. TEXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVRD vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRD achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 18.96% return.


CVRD

1D
-0.22%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-1.22%
6M
-1.31%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TEXN

1D
-0.90%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
18.96%
6M
17.41%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVRD vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
-1.22%5.50%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
18.96%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CVRD and TEXN is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.50

The correlation between CVRD and TEXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVRD vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVRD
TEXN

Technology

38.6%
20.6%

Financial Services

10.4%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
11.6%

Communication Services

7.5%
3.3%

Industrials

7.2%
16.3%

Healthcare

7.2%
2.7%

Energy

6.1%
32.3%

Real Estate

3.0%
3.9%

Basic Materials

2.3%
0.7%

Utilities

2.2%
2.7%

Technology

CVRD
38.6%
TEXN
20.6%

Financial Services

CVRD
10.4%
TEXN
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

CVRD
9.3%
TEXN
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CVRD
8.5%
TEXN
11.6%

Communication Services

CVRD
7.5%
TEXN
3.3%

Industrials

CVRD
7.2%
TEXN
16.3%

Healthcare

CVRD
7.2%
TEXN
2.7%

Energy

CVRD
6.1%
TEXN
32.3%

Real Estate

CVRD
3.0%
TEXN
3.9%

Basic Materials

CVRD
2.3%
TEXN
0.7%

Utilities

CVRD
2.2%
TEXN
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVRD vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVRD
CVRD Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CVRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRD Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

TEXN
TEXN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TEXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEXN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TEXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVRD vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVRDTEXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.35

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

4.55

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

15.80

-14.22

CVRD vs. TEXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the TEXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRD and TEXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVRD vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRD drawdown since its inception was -17.95%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRD and TEXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVRDTEXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.95%

-6.34%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-6.34%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.35%

-5.76%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-1.26%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.82%

+0.14%

Volatility

CVRD vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) is 2.67%, while iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that CVRD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVRDTEXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

4.95%

-2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

10.25%

-3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.64%

14.51%

-4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.77%

14.51%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.77%

14.51%

-2.74%

CVRD vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVRD vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

CVRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than TEXN's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
7.85%7.63%15.70%1.50%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
1.42%0.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVRD and TEXN have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEXN has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to CVRD (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRD dropped -17.95% vs TEXN's -6.34%.

On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 28.67% vs 3.08% for CVRD. On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CVRD has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 28.67% return vs 3.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CVRD.

CVRD has the higher dividend yield at 7.85%, compared with 1.42% for TEXN.

They also come from different issuers: Madison and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CVRD and 0.20% for TEXN.

TEXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVRD and TEXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer