CVRD vs. NRSH
CVRD (Madison Covered Call ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CVRD is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, CVRD returned 9.30% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVRD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
CVRD vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVRD achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.
CVRD
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 9.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRSH
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 47.92%
- 6M
- 46.01%
- 1Y
- 58.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVRD vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF | 2.84% | 5.94% | 4.90% | 2.86% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 47.92% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVRD and NRSH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between CVRD and NRSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CVRD vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVRD
NRSH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CVRD
NRSH
Financial Services
CVRD
NRSH
-
Consumer Defensive
CVRD
NRSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
CVRD
NRSH
-
Communication Services
CVRD
NRSH
-
Industrials
CVRD
NRSH
Energy
CVRD
NRSH
Healthcare
CVRD
NRSH
-
Real Estate
CVRD
NRSH
Basic Materials
CVRD
NRSH
-
Utilities
CVRD
NRSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVRD vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
CVRD
NRSH
CVRD vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVRD | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 5.40 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 16.86 | -11.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVRD | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.42 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.11 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
CVRD vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVRD drawdown since its inception was -17.95%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRD and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVRD | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -24.01% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.72% | -10.94% | +5.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | 0.00% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -5.62% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 3.50% | -1.70% |
Volatility
CVRD vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) is 2.61%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that CVRD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVRD | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 9.21% | -6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 20.27% | -13.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.71% | 24.44% | -14.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.82% | 21.54% | -9.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.82% | 21.54% | -9.72% |
CVRD vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVRD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVRD vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
CVRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF | 7.54% | 7.63% | 15.70% | 1.50% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVRD and NRSH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to CVRD (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRD dropped -17.95% vs NRSH's -24.01%.
On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 9.30% for CVRD. On fees, NRSH is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CVRD has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NRSH is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CVRD.
CVRD has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.
They also come from different issuers: Madison and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CVRD and 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVRD and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer