CVRD vs. DMAY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CVRD (Madison Covered Call ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CVRD is actively managed, while DMAY is passively managed. Over the past year, CVRD returned 9.30% vs 12.37% for DMAY. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVRD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.

Performance

CVRD vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRD achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than DMAY's 4.42% return.

CVRD

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 3.26%
• 1Y: 9.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DMAY

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 12.37%
• 3Y*: 11.96%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVRD vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF	2.84%	5.94%	4.90%	5.15%
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May	4.42%	11.05%	12.82%	5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CVRD and DMAY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023	0.68

The correlation between CVRD and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVRD vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CVRD	DMAY
Technology	35.5%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.2%	11.9%
Consumer Defensive	9.8%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	10.1%
Communication Services	7.9%	10.9%
Industrials	7.3%	8.1%
Energy	7.1%	3.5%
Healthcare	6.8%	8.4%
Real Estate	3.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	2.4%	1.8%
Utilities	2.2%	2.3%

Return for Risk

CVRD vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVRD

CVRD Risk / Return Rank: 30
CVRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CVRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CVRD Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CVRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CVRD Martin Ratio Rank: 35

DMAY

DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 85
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVRD vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVRD	DMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	2.65	-1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	4.00	-2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.60	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	3.73	-2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.17	22.76	-17.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVRD vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the DMAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRD and DMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVRD	DMAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	2.65	-1.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.88	-0.29

Drawdowns

CVRD vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRD drawdown since its inception was -17.95%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRD and DMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVRD	DMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.95%	-13.90%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.72%	-3.36%	-2.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-0.30%	-1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.00%	-2.24%	+0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	0.55%	+1.25%

Volatility

CVRD vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison

Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that CVRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVRD	DMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.61%	0.84%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.95%	3.74%	+3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.71%	4.73%	+4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.82%	9.02%	+2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.82%	8.43%	+3.39%

CVRD vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVRD vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

CVRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF	7.54%	7.63%	15.70%	1.50%
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVRD and DMAY in my portfolio?

CVRD and DMAY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVRD or DMAY?

CVRD has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRD dropped -17.95% vs DMAY's -13.90%.

Which ETF is better, CVRD or DMAY?

On 1-year performance, DMAY leads with 12.37% vs 9.30% for CVRD. On fees, DMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVRD or DMAY?

Over the 1-year period, DMAY has performed better with a 12.37% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVRD or DMAY?

DMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CVRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVRD or DMAY?

CVRD has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

What is the main difference between CVRD and DMAY?

They also come from different issuers: Madison and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CVRD and 0.85% for DMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.