PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVRD vs. BUYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVRD vs. BUYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRD achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than BUYW's 5.08% return.


CVRD

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.03%
6M
0.20%
YTD
2.56%
1Y
7.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.19%

BUYW

1D
0.28%
1M
0.64%
6M
4.41%
YTD
5.08%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.71M$4.95M$4.82M
$200.88K$121.50K$51.62K

CVRD vs. BUYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
2.56%5.94%4.90%4.74%
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.08%9.08%9.82%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CVRD and BUYW is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023

0.54

The correlation between CVRD and BUYW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVRD vs. BUYW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVRD
BUYW

Technology

26.6%
25.9%

Healthcare

12.5%
13.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.2%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
6.0%

Industrials

8.3%
4.6%

Communication Services

7.9%
6.5%

Energy

5.9%
12.4%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.0%

Utilities

2.5%
10.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.0%

Technology

CVRD
26.6%
BUYW
25.9%

Healthcare

CVRD
12.5%
BUYW
13.8%

Financial Services

CVRD
11.9%
BUYW
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

CVRD
10.2%
BUYW
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CVRD
9.0%
BUYW
6.0%

Industrials

CVRD
8.3%
BUYW
4.6%

Communication Services

CVRD
7.9%
BUYW
6.5%

Energy

CVRD
5.9%
BUYW
12.4%

Real Estate

CVRD
3.0%
BUYW
1.0%

Utilities

CVRD
2.5%
BUYW
10.9%

Basic Materials

CVRD
2.2%
BUYW
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVRD vs. BUYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVRD
CVRD Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CVRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRD Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BUYW
BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVRD vs. BUYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVRDBUYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

3.63

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

19.32

-16.05

CVRD vs. BUYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the BUYW Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRD and BUYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVRD vs. BUYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRD drawdown since its inception was -17.95%, which is greater than BUYW's maximum drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRD and BUYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVRDBUYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.95%

-9.36%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-2.59%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

0.00%

-1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-0.59%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

0.49%

+1.72%

Volatility

CVRD vs. BUYW - Volatility Comparison

Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) at 1.11%. This indicates that CVRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVRDBUYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

1.11%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

3.91%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

4.87%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.68%

8.33%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.68%

8.33%

+3.35%

CVRD vs. BUYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYW's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVRD vs. BUYW - Dividend Comparison

CVRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, more than BUYW's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.90%5.89%5.93%5.95%0.50%
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
7.69%7.63%15.70%1.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVRD and BUYW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVRD has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to BUYW (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRD dropped -17.95% vs BUYW's -9.36%.

On 1-year performance, BUYW leads with 9.35% vs 7.20% for CVRD. On fees, CVRD is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BUYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUYW has performed better with a 9.35% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVRD is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

CVRD has the higher dividend yield at 7.69%, compared with 5.90% for BUYW.

They also come from different issuers: Madison and Main. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CVRD and 1.29% for BUYW.

BUYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVRD and BUYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer