CVNY vs. LQTI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).

CVNY and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CVNY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jan 29, 2025. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.

Performance

CVNY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CVNY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF	-23.28%	40.41%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.44%	6.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -23.28% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.44% return.

CVNY

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: -23.28%
• 6M: -17.45%
• 1Y: 40.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: -0.44%
• 6M: -0.03%
• 1Y: 4.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVNY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

CVNY

YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF

LQTI

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

Return for Risk

CVNY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVNY

CVNY Risk / Return Rank: 39
CVNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CVNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CVNY Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CVNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CVNY Martin Ratio Rank: 33

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 36
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVNY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVNY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.74	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	1.02	+0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.14	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	1.37	-0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.12	4.15	-1.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVNY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNY and LQTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVNY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.74	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.90	-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between CVNY and LQTI is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CVNY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 121.31%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.

	TTM	2025
CVNY YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF	121.31%	80.86%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%

Drawdowns

CVNY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVNY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.27%	-3.41%	-39.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.27%	-3.41%	-32.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.96%	-2.03%	-28.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.33%	-0.78%	-11.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.56%	1.12%	+12.44%

Volatility

CVNY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 2.66%. This indicates that CVNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVNY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.54%	2.66%	+11.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.12%	3.87%	+36.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.67%	6.23%	+50.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.96%	6.11%	+53.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.96%	6.11%	+53.85%