PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVMC vs. CVSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVMC vs. CVSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly higher than CVSB's 1.48% return.


CVMC

1D
-0.01%
1M
6.27%
YTD
15.51%
6M
15.72%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
10Y*

CVSB

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.48%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVMC vs. CVSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
15.51%9.52%12.57%4.40%
CVSB
Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF
1.48%4.92%6.23%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMC and CVSB is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVMC vs. CVSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVMC
CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CVSB
CVSB Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CVSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CVSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVMC vs. CVSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVMCCVSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

5.12

-3.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

8.83

-6.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.38

-1.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

19.85

-17.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.15

80.53

-69.38

CVMC vs. CVSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the CVSB Sharpe Ratio of 5.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMC and CVSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVMCCVSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

5.12

-3.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

4.13

-3.36

Drawdowns

CVMC vs. CVSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, which is greater than CVSB's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and CVSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVMCCVSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-0.63%

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-0.23%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.53%

-0.63%

-21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.03%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-0.05%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

0.06%

+2.26%

Volatility

CVMC vs. CVSB - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB) at 0.15%. This indicates that CVMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVMCCVSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

0.15%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

0.53%

+9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

0.88%

+13.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

1.32%

+15.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

1.32%

+15.14%

CVMC vs. CVSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSB's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CVMC vs. CVSB - Dividend Comparison

CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than CVSB's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.17%1.39%1.21%1.00%
CVSB
Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF
4.37%4.72%5.13%4.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVMC and CVSB have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVMC has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to CVSB (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs CVSB's -0.63%.

On 3-year performance, CVMC leads with 16.44% vs 5.54% for CVSB. On fees, CVMC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CVSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVMC has performed better with a 16.44% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVMC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for CVSB.

CVSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 1.17% for CVMC.

CVMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while CVSB is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.24% for CVSB.

CVSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.12 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVMC and CVSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer