CVMC vs. CTEF
CVMC (Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. CVMC is passively managed, while CTEF is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVMC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
CVMC vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.35% return.
CVMC
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVMC vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 15.51% | 9.55% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.35% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVMC and CTEF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVMC vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
CVMC
CTEF
CVMC vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 3.54 | -2.77 |
Drawdowns
CVMC vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.53% | -15.00% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.41% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -1.80% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | — | — |
Volatility
CVMC vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 21.81% | -7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 21.81% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 21.81% | -5.35% |
CVMC vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVMC vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 1.17% | 1.39% | 1.21% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVMC and CTEF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CVMC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CVMC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.
CVMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for CVMC and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer