CVLC vs. DMAY
CVLC (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CVLC tracks the Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVLC returned 22.60%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
CVLC vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.73% return.
CVLC
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 31.25%
- 3Y*
- 22.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
CVLC vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 13.18% | 16.13% | 24.20% | 17.14% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.73% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 10.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVLC and DMAY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between CVLC and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
CVLC vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVLC
DMAY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
CVLC
DMAY
Financial Services
CVLC
DMAY
Industrials
CVLC
DMAY
Healthcare
CVLC
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
CVLC
DMAY
Communication Services
CVLC
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
CVLC
DMAY
Real Estate
CVLC
DMAY
Utilities
CVLC
DMAY
Basic Materials
CVLC
DMAY
Energy
CVLC
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVLC vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
CVLC
DMAY
CVLC vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVLC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.79 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.46 | 4.20 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.63 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 4.06 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.18 | 24.92 | -9.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVLC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.79 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.88 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
CVLC vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVLC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -13.90% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -3.36% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | -12.38% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -2.24% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 0.55% | +1.54% |
Volatility
CVLC vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.76%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVLC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 0.76% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 3.73% | +5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 4.71% | +7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 9.02% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 8.43% | +7.12% |
CVLC vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVLC vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 0.89% | 1.02% | 1.03% | 0.91% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, CVLC and DMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CVLC has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to DMAY (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 22.60% vs 12.07% for DMAY. On fees, CVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 22.60% return vs 12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
CVLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVLC and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer