CVISX vs. HLMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX).
CVISX is managed by Causeway. It was launched on Oct 19, 2014. HLMSX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on Mar 25, 2007.
Performance
CVISX vs. HLMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CVISX vs. HLMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund | 4.10% | 32.93% | 9.71% | 26.74% | -11.51% | 21.30% | 2.48% | 18.55% | -21.34% | 34.52% |
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio | -5.34% | 14.87% | -6.92% | 11.78% | -24.50% | 12.82% | 18.51% | 29.45% | -17.65% | 34.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVISX achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly higher than HLMSX's -5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CVISX has outperformed HLMSX with an annualized return of 10.79%, while HLMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.
CVISX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -10.77%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 35.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
HLMSX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -9.34%
- YTD
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CVISX vs. HLMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVISX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HLMSX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CVISX vs. HLMSX — Risk / Return Rank
CVISX
HLMSX
CVISX vs. HLMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVISX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 0.40 | +1.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | 0.61 | +2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.08 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 0.40 | +2.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.15 | 1.03 | +9.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVISX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 0.40 | +1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | -0.04 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.35 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.32 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between CVISX and HLMSX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CVISX vs. HLMSX - Dividend Comparison
CVISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.91%, more than HLMSX's 4.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund | 15.91% | 16.56% | 10.60% | 6.14% | 2.75% | 3.48% | 3.42% | 3.57% | 2.91% | 8.23% | 2.78% | 2.00% |
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio | 4.27% | 4.04% | 1.17% | 1.00% | 1.83% | 2.82% | 0.03% | 0.52% | 7.56% | 1.13% | 4.37% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
CVISX vs. HLMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVISX drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, smaller than the maximum HLMSX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVISX and HLMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVISX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.50% | -60.77% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -10.59% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | -38.22% | +13.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.50% | -38.22% | -10.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.77% | -19.20% | +8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -13.24% | +4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 4.18% | -1.01% |
Volatility
CVISX vs. HLMSX - Volatility Comparison
Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) at 5.07%. This indicates that CVISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CVISX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 5.07% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 8.35% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 13.26% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 14.90% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 14.86% | +1.89% |