PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMSX vs. AIOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLMSX vs. AIOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and American Century International Opportunities Fund (AIOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMSX achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly higher than AIOIX's 5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMSX has underperformed AIOIX with an annualized return of 6.13%, while AIOIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.07% annualized return.


HLMSX

1D
1.44%
1M
1.55%
6M
5.58%
YTD
8.43%
1Y
7.49%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
6.13%
ALL TIME*
5.63%

AIOIX

1D
3.73%
1M
-4.57%
6M
-1.73%
YTD
5.83%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
7.07%
ALL TIME*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HLMSX vs. AIOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
8.43%14.87%-6.92%11.78%-24.50%12.82%18.51%29.45%-17.65%34.42%
AIOIX
American Century International Opportunities Fund
5.83%29.62%1.31%8.63%-30.19%5.79%31.07%28.95%-22.19%45.09%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMSX and AIOIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2007

0.86

The correlation between HLMSX and AIOIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMSX vs. AIOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HLMSX
HLMSX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
HLMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

AIOIX
AIOIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AIOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
AIOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HLMSX vs. AIOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and American Century International Opportunities Fund (AIOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLMSXAIOIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.14

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.15

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

3.57

-1.93

HLMSX vs. AIOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the AIOIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMSX and AIOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLMSX vs. AIOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, smaller than the maximum AIOIX drawdown of -66.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMSX and AIOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMSXAIOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-66.16%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-14.00%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-17.09%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.22%

-41.19%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

-41.19%

+2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.45%

-10.37%

+2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.20%

-15.96%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

4.50%

-0.34%

Volatility

HLMSX vs. AIOIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) is 4.00%, while American Century International Opportunities Fund (AIOIX) has a volatility of 8.01%. This indicates that HLMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMSXAIOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

8.01%

-4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

19.30%

-8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

21.80%

-9.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

19.49%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

19.03%

-4.21%

HLMSX vs. AIOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMSX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is lower than AIOIX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLMSX vs. AIOIX - Dividend Comparison

HLMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than AIOIX's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIOIX
American Century International Opportunities Fund
0.26%0.27%0.32%0.23%0.00%17.80%3.18%0.92%5.28%9.09%0.04%7.15%
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
3.73%4.04%1.17%1.00%1.83%2.82%0.03%0.52%7.56%1.13%4.37%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLMSX and AIOIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIOIX has higher volatility (8.01%) compared to HLMSX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMSX dropped -60.77% vs AIOIX's -66.16%.

AIOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMSX and AIOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer