PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMSX vs. DRIOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLMSX vs. DRIOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMSX achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than DRIOX's 13.02% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMSX has underperformed DRIOX with an annualized return of 6.09%, while DRIOX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.


HLMSX

1D
0.10%
1M
3.73%
YTD
7.33%
6M
9.98%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
6.09%

DRIOX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.21%
YTD
13.02%
6M
16.19%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMSX vs. DRIOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
7.33%14.87%-6.92%11.78%-24.50%12.82%18.51%29.45%-17.65%34.42%
DRIOX
Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund
13.02%28.93%3.15%11.96%-24.37%12.44%29.84%30.41%-17.03%41.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMSX and DRIOX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2007

0.85

The correlation between HLMSX and DRIOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMSX vs. DRIOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMSX
HLMSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HLMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIOX
DRIOX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DRIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMSX vs. DRIOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLMSXDRIOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.52

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

2.18

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.27

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.84

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.99

6.77

-4.78

HLMSX vs. DRIOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the DRIOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMSX and DRIOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLMSXDRIOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.52

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.19

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.48

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.38

-0.02

Drawdowns

HLMSX vs. DRIOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIOX drawdown of -59.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMSX and DRIOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMSXDRIOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-59.68%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-14.47%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-17.23%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.22%

-47.73%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

-47.73%

+9.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.39%

-0.84%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.22%

-15.30%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

3.94%

+0.31%

Volatility

HLMSX vs. DRIOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) is 3.33%, while Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that HLMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMSXDRIOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

5.72%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

14.49%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

17.26%

-5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

23.90%

-8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

20.96%

-5.99%

HLMSX vs. DRIOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMSX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIOX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLMSX vs. DRIOX - Dividend Comparison

HLMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than DRIOX's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIOX
Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund
0.94%1.06%0.51%1.16%5.94%27.01%8.26%0.77%16.19%15.63%0.00%2.72%
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
3.76%4.04%1.17%1.00%1.83%2.82%0.03%0.52%7.56%1.13%4.37%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLMSX and DRIOX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIOX has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to HLMSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMSX dropped -60.77% vs DRIOX's -59.68%.

DRIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMSX and DRIOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer