PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVIE vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVIE vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVIE achieves a 19.14% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return.


CVIE

1D
0.18%
1M
6.70%
YTD
19.14%
6M
22.24%
1Y
36.01%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
-2.71%
1M
-9.80%
YTD
85.31%
6M
79.66%
1Y
88.71%
3Y*
26.74%
5Y*
23.48%
10Y*
13.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVIE vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVIE
Calvert International Responsible Index ETF
19.14%33.23%5.37%8.48%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
85.31%-5.44%9.67%-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CVIE and BNO is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CVIE and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.38, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVIE vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVIE
CVIE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CVIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVIE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CVIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVIE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVIE vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVIEBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.99

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.31

9.39

+1.92

CVIE vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVIE Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVIE and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVIEBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.15

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.14

+1.14

Drawdowns

CVIE vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVIE drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVIE and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVIEBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-87.06%

+73.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.71%

-17.87%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-23.75%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-12.72%

+12.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-40.16%

+37.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

9.48%

-6.29%

Volatility

CVIE vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) is 6.03%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that CVIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVIEBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

14.12%

-8.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

36.21%

-21.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

41.56%

-24.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

35.40%

-20.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

36.69%

-21.31%

CVIE vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVIE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVIE vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

CVIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CVIE
Calvert International Responsible Index ETF
2.22%2.85%2.78%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVIE and BNO have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to CVIE (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVIE dropped -13.52% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 3-year performance, BNO leads with 26.74% vs 21.69% for CVIE. On fees, CVIE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CVIE has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BNO has performed better with a 26.74% return vs 21.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVIE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

CVIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

CVIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. CVIE tracks Calvert International Responsible Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CVIE and 0.90% for BNO.

CVIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVIE and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer