PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVE vs. GOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CVE vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVE achieves a 68.13% return, which is significantly higher than GOOG's 14.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CVE has underperformed GOOG with an annualized return of 9.03%, while GOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.


CVE

1D
-0.74%
1M
-8.27%
YTD
68.13%
6M
59.06%
1Y
95.05%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
26.16%
10Y*
9.03%

GOOG

1D
0.45%
1M
-8.88%
YTD
14.29%
6M
15.49%
1Y
104.22%
3Y*
42.67%
5Y*
23.51%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVE vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVE
Cenovus Energy Inc.
68.13%15.84%-5.83%-12.30%60.93%104.72%-39.59%46.98%-21.51%-38.38%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
14.29%65.42%35.62%58.83%-38.67%65.17%31.03%29.10%-1.03%35.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CVE and GOOG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2014

0.21

The correlation between CVE and GOOG shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CVE:

$53.12B

GOOG:

$4.38T

EPS

CVE:

CA$2.52

GOOG:

$13.11

PE Ratio

CVE:

15.67

GOOG:

27.31

PEG Ratio

CVE:

0.06

GOOG:

1.34

PS Ratio

CVE:

1.47

GOOG:

10.35

PB Ratio

CVE:

2.28

GOOG:

9.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVE:

CA$49.40B

GOOG:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVE:

CA$9.68B

GOOG:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

CVE:

CA$11.54B

GOOG:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVE vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVE
CVE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVE vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVEGOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.59

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.52

4.99

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.09

17.56

+3.53

CVE vs. GOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the GOOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVE and GOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVE vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVE drawdown since its inception was -94.87%, which is greater than GOOG's maximum drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVE and GOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVEGOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.87%

-44.60%

-50.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.72%

-20.75%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.57%

-29.35%

-20.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.51%

-44.60%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.22%

-44.60%

-44.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.10%

-10.19%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.12%

-8.89%

-35.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

5.88%

-1.00%

Volatility

CVE vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison

Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) has a higher volatility of 11.65% compared to Alphabet Inc (GOOG) at 7.29%. This indicates that CVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVEGOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.65%

7.29%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.07%

20.47%

+6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.64%

28.75%

+5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.22%

31.15%

+9.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.58%

29.02%

+21.56%

Dividends

CVE vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison

CVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than GOOG's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVE
Cenovus Energy Inc.
1.55%3.32%3.92%2.33%1.81%0.56%0.75%1.58%2.34%2.19%1.32%6.75%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.24%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CVE vs. GOOG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cenovus Energy Inc. and Alphabet Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
12.39B
109.90B
(CVE) Total Revenue
(GOOG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CVE values in CAD, GOOG values in USD

CVE vs. GOOG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cenovus Energy Inc. and Alphabet Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
21.9%
62.5%
Portfolio components
CVE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.71B and revenue of 12.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

GOOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

CVE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 2.30B and revenue of 12.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

GOOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

CVE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported a net income of 1.57B and revenue of 12.39B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.

GOOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CVE and GOOG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVE has higher volatility (11.65%) compared to GOOG (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVE dropped -94.87% vs GOOG's -44.60%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVE and GOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer