CVE vs. SU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU).

Performance

CVE vs. SU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CVE vs. SU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CVE Cenovus Energy Inc.	57.78%	15.84%	-5.83%	-12.30%	60.93%	104.72%	-39.59%	46.98%	-21.51%	-38.38%
SU Suncor Energy Inc.	50.18%	29.69%	16.22%	6.40%	32.31%	54.94%	-46.67%	22.10%	-21.27%	17.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CVE : $49.45B SU : $79.40B
EPS CVE : $2.15 SU : $4.88
PE Ratio CVE : 12.35 SU : 13.55
PEG Ratio CVE : 0.05 SU : 0.49
PS Ratio CVE : 0.95 SU : 1.61
PB Ratio CVE : 1.57 SU : 1.76
Total Revenue (TTM) CVE : $51.21B SU : $49.66B
Gross Profit (TTM) CVE : $10.08B SU : $21.23B
EBITDA (TTM) CVE : $10.22B SU : $16.17B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVE achieves a 57.78% return, which is significantly higher than SU's 50.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CVE has underperformed SU with an annualized return of 9.84%, while SU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.77% annualized return.

CVE

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 19.66%
• YTD: 57.78%
• 6M: 58.41%
• 1Y: 97.16%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: 30.68%
• 10Y*: 9.84%

SU

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 17.87%
• YTD: 50.18%
• 6M: 60.92%
• 1Y: 77.54%
• 3Y*: 34.52%
• 5Y*: 30.72%
• 10Y*: 13.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CVE vs. SU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVE

CVE Risk / Return Rank: 92
CVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CVE Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CVE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

SU

SU Risk / Return Rank: 94
SU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SU Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SU Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SU Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVE vs. SU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVE	SU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.90	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	3.39	-0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.50	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	4.09	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.13	13.86	+1.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVE vs. SU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the SU Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVE and SU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVE	SU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.90	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.94	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	0.37	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.42	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between CVE and SU is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CVE vs. SU - Dividend Comparison

CVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than SU's 2.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVE Cenovus Energy Inc.	2.20%	3.32%	3.92%	2.33%	1.81%	0.56%	0.75%	1.58%	2.34%	2.19%	1.32%	6.75%
SU Suncor Energy Inc.	2.57%	3.72%	4.51%	5.27%	4.56%	3.34%	4.93%	3.84%	4.24%	4.16%	3.55%	4.42%

Drawdowns

CVE vs. SU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVE drawdown since its inception was -94.87%, which is greater than SU's maximum drawdown of -80.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVE and SU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVE	SU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.87%	-80.22%	-14.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.64%	-19.40%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.51%	-36.58%	-16.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.35%	-73.54%	-15.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.63%	-0.83%	-2.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.60%	-27.55%	-17.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.54%	5.72%	+0.82%

Volatility

CVE vs. SU - Volatility Comparison

Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) at 5.32%. This indicates that CVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVE	SU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.73%	5.32%	+3.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.03%	15.05%	+8.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.37%	26.93%	+13.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.55%	32.89%	+7.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.62%	36.86%	+13.76%

Financials

CVE vs. SU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cenovus Energy Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CVE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 10.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.1%.

SU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.83B and revenue of 12.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

CVE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 10.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

SU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported an operating income of -35.52M and revenue of 12.03B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

CVE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported a net income of 933.24M and revenue of 10.87B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

SU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported a net income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.03B, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.