CVAR vs. SYLD
CVAR (Cultivar ETF) and SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVAR returned 8.68%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for SYLD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CVAR charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SYLD.
Performance
CVAR vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVAR achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 13.63% return.
CVAR
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 13.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SYLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 25.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
CVAR vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVAR Cultivar ETF | 1.44% | 14.95% | 3.12% | 11.74% | -5.03% | 0.71% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 13.63% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVAR and SYLD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between CVAR and SYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVAR vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank
CVAR
SYLD
CVAR vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVAR | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 1.65 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 2.54 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 3.70 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 10.02 | -5.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVAR | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.65 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.57 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
CVAR vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVAR drawdown since its inception was -19.39%, smaller than the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVAR and SYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVAR | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.39% | -45.36% | +25.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -6.93% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -26.62% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -1.31% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -5.66% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 2.55% | +0.89% |
Volatility
CVAR vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cultivar ETF (CVAR) is 2.15%, while Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that CVAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVAR | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.15% | 3.13% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 9.94% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.40% | 15.55% | -4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 20.62% | -5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 22.96% | -7.49% |
CVAR vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVAR has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVAR vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison
CVAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than SYLD's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVAR Cultivar ETF | 1.50% | 1.53% | 3.57% | 1.41% | 5.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.86% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVAR and SYLD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SYLD has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to CVAR (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVAR dropped -19.39% vs SYLD's -45.36%.
On 3-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.47% vs 8.68% for CVAR. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CVAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for CVAR.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.50% for CVAR.
They also come from different issuers: Cultivar and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for CVAR and 0.59% for SYLD.
SYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVAR and SYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer