CVAR vs. COWS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CVAR (Cultivar ETF) and COWS (Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. CVAR is actively managed, while COWS is passively managed. Over the past year, CVAR returned 11.92% vs 30.18% for COWS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVAR charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for COWS.

Performance

CVAR vs. COWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVAR achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than COWS's 9.22% return.

CVAR

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: 11.92%
• 3Y*: 8.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COWS

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 9.22%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 30.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVAR vs. COWS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CVAR Cultivar ETF	0.62%	14.95%	3.12%	8.03%
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF	9.22%	15.29%	11.08%	9.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CVAR and COWS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.79

The correlation between CVAR and COWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CVAR vs. COWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVAR

CVAR Risk / Return Rank: 29
CVAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CVAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CVAR Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CVAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CVAR Martin Ratio Rank: 26

COWS

COWS Risk / Return Rank: 65
COWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
COWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
COWS Omega Ratio Rank: 53
COWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
COWS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVAR vs. COWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVAR	COWS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.88	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.76	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.33	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	4.71	-3.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.45	14.35	-10.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVAR vs. COWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the COWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVAR and COWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVAR	COWS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	1.88	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.90	-0.54

Drawdowns

CVAR vs. COWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVAR drawdown since its inception was -19.39%, smaller than the maximum COWS drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVAR and COWS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVAR	COWS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.39%	-24.76%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.45%	-6.44%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.22%	-0.90%	-5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-3.95%	-1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.11%	+1.35%

Volatility

CVAR vs. COWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cultivar ETF (CVAR) is 2.24%, while Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that CVAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVAR	COWS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.24%	4.58%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.48%	10.09%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.43%	16.21%	-4.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	18.85%	-3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	18.85%	-3.38%

CVAR vs. COWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVAR has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than COWS's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVAR vs. COWS - Dividend Comparison

CVAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than COWS's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF	1.60%	2.04%	2.08%	0.67%	0.00%
CVAR Cultivar ETF	1.52%	1.53%	3.57%	1.41%	5.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVAR and COWS in my portfolio?

CVAR and COWS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVAR or COWS?

COWS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to CVAR (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVAR dropped -19.39% vs COWS's -24.76%.

Which ETF is better, CVAR or COWS?

On 1-year performance, COWS leads with 30.18% vs 11.92% for CVAR. On fees, COWS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, CVAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVAR or COWS?

Over the 1-year period, COWS has performed better with a 30.18% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVAR or COWS?

COWS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for CVAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVAR or COWS?

COWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.52% for CVAR.

What is the main difference between CVAR and COWS?

They also come from different issuers: Cultivar and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for CVAR and 0.00% for COWS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.