CUT vs. XLBI
CUT (Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF) and XLBI (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CUT is a Materials fund tracking the Beacon Global Timber Index, while XLBI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. CUT is passively managed, while XLBI is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CUT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLBI.
Performance
CUT vs. XLBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUT achieves a -4.74% return, which is significantly lower than XLBI's 6.83% return.
CUT
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- -4.74%
- 1Y
- -8.82%
- 3Y*
- -0.71%
- 5Y*
- -3.71%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
XLBI
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CUT vs. XLBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | -4.74% | -3.18% |
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.83% | 2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUT and XLBI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.71 |
CUT vs. XLBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CUT
XLBI
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
CUT
XLBI
-
Basic Materials
CUT
XLBI
-
Real Estate
CUT
XLBI
-
Industrials
CUT
XLBI
-
Financial Services
CUT
XLBI
Consumer Defensive
CUT
XLBI
-
Technology
CUT
XLBI
-
Communication Services
CUT
-
XLBI
-
Energy
CUT
-
XLBI
-
Healthcare
CUT
-
XLBI
-
Utilities
CUT
-
XLBI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUT vs. XLBI — Risk / Return Rank
CUT
XLBI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CUT vs. XLBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUT | XLBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUT vs. XLBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUT drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, which is greater than XLBI's maximum drawdown of -10.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUT and XLBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUT | XLBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.03% | -10.62% | -59.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.31% | -2.76% | -19.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.30% | -2.10% | -13.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.10% | — | — |
Volatility
CUT vs. XLBI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUT | XLBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.75% | 13.94% | +4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 13.94% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.05% | 13.94% | +6.11% |
CUT vs. XLBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CUT vs. XLBI - Dividend Comparison
CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than XLBI's 14.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | 2.58% | 2.46% | 3.05% | 2.44% | 2.58% | 1.57% | 1.65% | 2.67% | 3.43% | 1.57% | 2.08% | 1.52% |
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.97% | 7.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CUT and XLBI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CUT.
XLBI has the higher dividend yield at 14.97%, compared with 2.58% for CUT.
CUT is categorized as Materials, while XLBI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CUT and 0.35% for XLBI.
Find the right allocation for CUT and XLBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer