PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUT vs. XLBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUT vs. XLBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUT achieves a -4.74% return, which is significantly lower than XLBI's 6.83% return.


CUT

1D
-1.24%
1M
-0.70%
6M
-8.57%
YTD
-4.74%
1Y
-8.82%
3Y*
-0.71%
5Y*
-3.71%
10Y*
3.95%

XLBI

1D
-0.90%
1M
-1.70%
6M
4.52%
YTD
6.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUT vs. XLBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CUT and XLBI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.71

CUT vs. XLBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CUT
XLBI

Consumer Cyclical

45.0%

-

Basic Materials

41.3%

-

Real Estate

10.1%

-

Industrials

3.6%

-

Financial Services

0.3%
98.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%

-

Technology

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

CUT
45.0%
XLBI

-

Basic Materials

CUT
41.3%
XLBI

-

Real Estate

CUT
10.1%
XLBI

-

Industrials

CUT
3.6%
XLBI

-

Financial Services

CUT
0.3%
XLBI
98.9%

Consumer Defensive

CUT
0.2%
XLBI

-

Technology

CUT
0.1%
XLBI

-

Communication Services

CUT

-

XLBI

-

Energy

CUT

-

XLBI

-

Healthcare

CUT

-

XLBI

-

Utilities

CUT

-

XLBI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUT vs. XLBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUT
CUT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUT Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XLBI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUT vs. XLBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CUTXLBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

CUT vs. XLBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CUT vs. XLBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUT drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, which is greater than XLBI's maximum drawdown of -10.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUT and XLBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUTXLBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.03%

-10.62%

-59.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.31%

-2.76%

-19.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.30%

-2.10%

-13.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.10%

Volatility

CUT vs. XLBI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUTXLBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

13.94%

+4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

13.94%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.05%

13.94%

+6.11%

CUT vs. XLBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CUT vs. XLBI - Dividend Comparison

CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than XLBI's 14.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
2.58%2.46%3.05%2.44%2.58%1.57%1.65%2.67%3.43%1.57%2.08%1.52%
XLBI
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
14.97%7.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CUT and XLBI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CUT.

XLBI has the higher dividend yield at 14.97%, compared with 2.58% for CUT.

CUT is categorized as Materials, while XLBI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CUT and 0.35% for XLBI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUT and XLBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer