CUT vs. SETM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CUT (Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF) and SETM (Sprott Critical Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - CUT tracks the Beacon Global Timber Index while SETM tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CUT returned 0.91%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for SETM. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CUT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SETM.

Performance

CUT vs. SETM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUT achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than SETM's -1.66% return.

CUT

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 5.48%
• 6M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 1Y: 3.71%
• 3Y*: 0.91%
• 5Y*: -2.27%
• 10Y*: 4.61%
• ALL TIME*: 3.07%

SETM

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: -8.93%
• 6M: -18.02%
• YTD: -1.66%
• 1Y: 55.17%
• 3Y*: 18.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF	$44.52K	$39.34K	$61.87K
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF	$3.56M	$4.68M	$7.65M

CUT vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF	2.55%	-5.92%	1.82%	0.05%
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF	-1.66%	95.27%	-13.24%	-13.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CUT and SETM is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.47

The correlation between CUT and SETM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CUT vs. SETM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CUT	SETM
Consumer Cyclical	49.2%	-
Basic Materials	37.4%	74.1%
Real Estate	9.5%	-
Industrials	3.9%	0.8%
Financial Services	0.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	0.1%
Technology	0.1%	0.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	25.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CUT vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CUT

CUT Risk / Return Rank: 15
CUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
CUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
CUT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
CUT Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SETM

SETM Risk / Return Rank: 49
SETM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SETM Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SETM Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SETM Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SETM Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CUT vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CUT	SETM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	1.23	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	1.71	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.22	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	1.91	-1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.38	4.72	-4.34

CUT vs. SETM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the SETM Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUT and SETM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CUT vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUT drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, which is greater than SETM's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUT and SETM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CUT	SETM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.03%	-42.81%	-27.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.62%	-30.05%	+10.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.23%	-42.81%	+20.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.37%	-28.34%	+11.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-15.34%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.44%	12.14%	-1.70%

Volatility

CUT vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) is 6.63%, while Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) has a volatility of 12.15%. This indicates that CUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CUT	SETM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.63%	12.15%	-5.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.11%	37.35%	-22.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.10%	46.79%	-27.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	37.25%	-18.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.10%	37.25%	-17.15%

CUT vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CUT vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison

CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than SETM's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF	2.40%	2.46%	3.05%	2.44%	2.58%	1.57%	1.65%	2.67%	3.43%	1.57%	2.08%	1.52%
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF	1.59%	1.56%	2.07%	2.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CUT and SETM in my portfolio?

CUT and SETM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CUT or SETM?

SETM has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to CUT (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUT dropped -70.03% vs SETM's -42.81%.

Which ETF is better, CUT or SETM?

On 3-year performance, SETM leads with 18.39% vs 0.91% for CUT. On fees, CUT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, CUT has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CUT or SETM?

Over the 3-year period, SETM has performed better with a 18.39% return vs 0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CUT or SETM?

CUT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SETM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CUT or SETM?

CUT has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.59% for SETM.

What is the main difference between CUT and SETM?

CUT tracks Beacon Global Timber Index, while SETM tracks Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CUT and 0.65% for SETM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SETM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.