PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURLF vs. YOLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CURLF vs. YOLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CURLF vs. YOLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CURLF
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.
-4.05%61.54%-61.58%-5.52%-52.25%-24.82%89.73%-39.50%
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
-16.36%36.36%-17.81%-15.10%-72.21%-20.48%47.17%-50.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURLF achieves a -4.05% return, which is significantly higher than YOLO's -16.36% return.


CURLF

1D
8.43%
1M
3.78%
YTD
-4.05%
6M
-20.20%
1Y
184.47%
3Y*
-3.37%
5Y*
-30.71%
10Y*

YOLO

1D
3.37%
1M
-6.43%
YTD
-16.36%
6M
-21.14%
1Y
62.35%
3Y*
-0.06%
5Y*
-34.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURLF vs. YOLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURLF
CURLF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CURLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURLF Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CURLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

YOLO
YOLO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
YOLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YOLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
YOLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
YOLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
YOLO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURLF vs. YOLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CURLFYOLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

0.77

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.45

1.74

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.36

+1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.49

3.01

+2.48

CURLF vs. YOLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the YOLO Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURLF and YOLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CURLFYOLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

0.77

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

-0.65

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

-0.50

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between CURLF and YOLO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CURLF vs. YOLO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CURLF nor YOLO has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
CURLF
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%3.57%1.17%0.55%3.93%2.03%4.52%

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. YOLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -95.70%, roughly equal to the maximum YOLO drawdown of -94.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and YOLO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CURLFYOLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.70%

-94.68%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.79%

-41.09%

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.16%

-93.23%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.86%

-90.22%

+4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.75%

-68.45%

+10.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.31%

18.59%

+11.72%

Volatility

CURLF vs. YOLO - Volatility Comparison

Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a higher volatility of 24.37% compared to AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) at 15.55%. This indicates that CURLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YOLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CURLFYOLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.37%

15.55%

+8.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

82.97%

50.93%

+32.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

124.32%

71.92%

+52.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.35%

52.54%

+32.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.18%

50.88%

+32.30%