PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURLF vs. TCNNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CURLF vs. TCNNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURLF achieves a 35.32% return, which is significantly higher than TCNNF's -0.92% return.


CURLF

1D
-5.01%
1M
4.60%
YTD
35.32%
6M
39.75%
1Y
315.85%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
-25.54%
10Y*

TCNNF

1D
-7.62%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
44.22%
1Y
116.14%
3Y*
30.55%
5Y*
-25.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURLF vs. TCNNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CURLF
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.
35.32%61.54%-61.58%-5.52%-52.25%-24.82%89.73%33.12%-18.97%
TCNNF
Trulieve Cannabis Corp
-0.92%67.65%-0.51%-31.18%-70.90%-17.74%167.07%46.53%-5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CURLF and TCNNF is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018

0.63

The correlation between CURLF and TCNNF shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CURLF:

$2.64B

TCNNF:

$1.70B

EPS

CURLF:

-$0.13

TCNNF:

-$0.42

PS Ratio

CURLF:

2.02

TCNNF:

1.41

PB Ratio

CURLF:

3.21

TCNNF:

1.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

CURLF:

$1.30B

TCNNF:

$1.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CURLF:

$528.91M

TCNNF:

$670.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

CURLF:

$188.46M

TCNNF:

$276.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURLF vs. TCNNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURLF
CURLF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CURLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURLF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CURLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURLF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TCNNF
TCNNF Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TCNNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCNNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCNNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TCNNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCNNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURLF vs. TCNNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CURLFTCNNFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

0.97

+1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

2.33

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

2.15

+3.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.98

4.27

+5.71

CURLF vs. TCNNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURLF Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the TCNNF Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURLF and TCNNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CURLFTCNNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

0.97

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

-0.30

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.03

-0.05

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. TCNNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -95.70%, roughly equal to the maximum TCNNF drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and TCNNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CURLFTCNNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.70%

-93.88%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.79%

-54.42%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.28%

-77.52%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.06%

-91.77%

-3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.06%

-83.69%

+3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.26%

-61.17%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.82%

27.30%

+4.52%

Volatility

CURLF vs. TCNNF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) is 25.97%, while Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) has a volatility of 28.96%. This indicates that CURLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCNNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CURLFTCNNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.97%

28.96%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

86.97%

83.64%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

128.15%

120.71%

+7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.95%

87.79%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.26%

81.83%

+2.43%

Dividends

CURLF vs. TCNNF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CURLF nor TCNNF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CURLF vs. TCNNF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and Trulieve Cannabis Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
319.74M
286.75M
(CURLF) Total Revenue
(TCNNF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CURLF vs. TCNNF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and Trulieve Cannabis Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
38.1%
59.3%
Portfolio components
CURLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.91M and revenue of 319.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.

TCNNF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trulieve Cannabis Corp reported a gross profit of 170.08M and revenue of 286.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

CURLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 742.57K and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

TCNNF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trulieve Cannabis Corp reported an operating income of 35.73M and revenue of 286.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

CURLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 68.83M and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.

TCNNF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trulieve Cannabis Corp reported a net income of 2.41M and revenue of 286.75M, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CURLF and TCNNF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCNNF has higher volatility (28.96%) compared to CURLF (25.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURLF dropped -95.70% vs TCNNF's -93.88%.

CURLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CURLF and TCNNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer