PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURLF vs. NLCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CURLF vs. NLCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and NewLake Capital Partners, Inc. (NLCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURLF achieves a 42.46% return, which is significantly higher than NLCP's -3.96% return.


CURLF

1D
-1.37%
1M
5.90%
YTD
42.46%
6M
54.08%
1Y
333.84%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
-24.70%
10Y*

NLCP

1D
-4.01%
1M
3.48%
YTD
-3.96%
6M
24.88%
1Y
16.03%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURLF vs. NLCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CURLF
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.
42.46%61.54%-61.58%-5.52%-52.25%-19.47%
NLCP
NewLake Capital Partners, Inc.
-3.96%2.42%19.43%11.85%-39.27%-2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CURLF and NLCP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2021

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CURLF:

$2.78B

NLCP:

$312.14M

EPS

CURLF:

-$0.13

NLCP:

$1.23

PS Ratio

CURLF:

2.12

NLCP:

6.21

PB Ratio

CURLF:

3.38

NLCP:

0.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

CURLF:

$1.30B

NLCP:

$50.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CURLF:

$528.91M

NLCP:

$6.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

CURLF:

$188.46M

NLCP:

$42.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURLF vs. NLCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURLF
CURLF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CURLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURLF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CURLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURLF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NLCP
NLCP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NLCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLCP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NLCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLCP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURLF vs. NLCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and NewLake Capital Partners, Inc. (NLCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CURLFNLCPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

0.68

+1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

1.22

+1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.14

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

1.14

+4.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.47

2.35

+8.12

CURLF vs. NLCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURLF Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the NLCP Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURLF and NLCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CURLFNLCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

0.68

+1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

-0.17

+0.10

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. NLCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -95.70%, which is greater than NLCP's maximum drawdown of -58.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and NLCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CURLFNLCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.70%

-58.59%

-37.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.79%

-14.78%

-45.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.28%

-35.06%

-53.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.01%

-27.36%

-51.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.25%

-33.76%

-24.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.77%

7.16%

+24.61%

Volatility

CURLF vs. NLCP - Volatility Comparison

Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a higher volatility of 25.73% compared to NewLake Capital Partners, Inc. (NLCP) at 8.87%. This indicates that CURLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CURLFNLCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.73%

8.87%

+16.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.03%

19.39%

+67.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

128.02%

23.68%

+104.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.93%

29.97%

+57.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.26%

29.97%

+54.29%

Dividends

CURLF vs. NLCP - Dividend Comparison

CURLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CURLF
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLCP
NewLake Capital Partners, Inc.
11.58%10.80%9.71%9.81%8.99%1.50%

Financials

CURLF vs. NLCP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and NewLake Capital Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
319.74M
12.31M
(CURLF) Total Revenue
(NLCP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CURLF vs. NLCP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and NewLake Capital Partners, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
38.1%
0
Portfolio components
CURLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.91M and revenue of 319.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.

NLCP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NewLake Capital Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 12.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CURLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 742.57K and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

NLCP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NewLake Capital Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.01M and revenue of 12.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.9%.

CURLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 68.83M and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.

NLCP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NewLake Capital Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 5.78M and revenue of 12.31M, resulting in a net margin of 46.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CURLF and NLCP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CURLF has higher volatility (25.73%) compared to NLCP (8.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURLF dropped -95.70% vs NLCP's -58.59%.

CURLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CURLF and NLCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer