CURE vs. WEBL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) and WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CURE tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%) while WEBL tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CURE returned 1.51%/yr vs -21.02%/yr for WEBL. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CURE charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WEBL.

Performance

CURE vs. WEBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly higher than WEBL's -14.87% return.

CURE

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 13.53%
• YTD: -7.96%
• 6M: -6.00%
• 1Y: 26.46%
• 3Y*: 3.05%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: 13.49%

WEBL

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: -14.87%
• 6M: -15.88%
• 1Y: -12.75%
• 3Y*: 27.57%
• 5Y*: -21.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURE vs. WEBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares	-7.96%	22.55%	-8.47%	-9.40%	-20.51%	88.30%	5.02%	29.06%
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares	-14.87%	2.37%	76.78%	165.50%	-91.04%	2.73%	132.56%	10.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CURE and WEBL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between CURE and WEBL has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CURE vs. WEBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CURE	WEBL
Healthcare	100.0%	1.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	29.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	27.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	2.4%
Industrials	-	1.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	37.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CURE vs. WEBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURE

CURE Risk / Return Rank: 21
CURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CURE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CURE Martin Ratio Rank: 19

WEBL

WEBL Risk / Return Rank: 8
WEBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WEBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
WEBL Omega Ratio Rank: 9
WEBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
WEBL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURE vs. WEBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CURE	WEBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	-0.22	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	0.07	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.01	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	-0.23	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.94	-0.48	+2.42

CURE vs. WEBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the WEBL Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURE and WEBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CURE vs. WEBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, smaller than the maximum WEBL drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and WEBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CURE	WEBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.19%	-94.44%	+25.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.10%	-56.57%	+25.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.93%	-60.82%	+8.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.23%	-94.44%	+42.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.94%	-74.94%	+48.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.16%	-58.90%	+40.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.71%	26.44%	-12.73%

Volatility

CURE vs. WEBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) is 14.30%, while Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) has a volatility of 19.12%. This indicates that CURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CURE	WEBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.30%	19.12%	-4.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.87%	45.07%	-14.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.32%	57.70%	-13.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.84%	80.76%	-36.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.59%	82.82%	-33.23%

CURE vs. WEBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than WEBL's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CURE vs. WEBL - Dividend Comparison

CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than WEBL's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares	1.16%	1.12%	1.17%	2.02%	0.38%	0.02%	0.17%	0.40%	0.70%	0.18%
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares	0.23%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.79%	0.00%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CURE and WEBL in my portfolio?

CURE and WEBL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CURE or WEBL?

WEBL has higher volatility (19.12%) compared to CURE (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs WEBL's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, CURE or WEBL?

On 5-year performance, CURE leads with 1.51% vs -21.02% for WEBL. On fees, CURE is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, CURE has been the lower-risk option at 14.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CURE or WEBL?

Over the 5-year period, CURE has performed better with a 1.51% return vs -21.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CURE or WEBL?

CURE is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CURE or WEBL?

CURE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.23% for WEBL.

What is the main difference between CURE and WEBL?

CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 1.17% for WEBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.