CURE vs. TSLL
CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) and TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. CURE is passively managed, while TSLL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CURE returned 1.46%/yr vs -7.12%/yr for TSLL. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CURE charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TSLL.
Performance
CURE vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly higher than TSLL's -37.67% return.
CURE
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- 35.07%
- 3Y*
- 1.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
TSLL
- 1D
- -12.25%
- 1M
- -22.54%
- YTD
- -37.67%
- 6M
- -46.82%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- -7.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CURE vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | -10.45% | 22.55% | -8.47% | -9.40% | 4.12% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -37.67% | -26.80% | 99.63% | 139.86% | -74.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CURE and TSLL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.18 |
CURE vs. TSLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CURE
TSLL
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
CURE
TSLL
-
Basic Materials
CURE
-
TSLL
-
Communication Services
CURE
-
TSLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
CURE
-
TSLL
Consumer Defensive
CURE
-
TSLL
-
Energy
CURE
-
TSLL
-
Financial Services
CURE
-
TSLL
-
Industrials
CURE
-
TSLL
-
Real Estate
CURE
-
TSLL
-
Technology
CURE
-
TSLL
-
Utilities
CURE
-
TSLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CURE vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank
CURE
TSLL
CURE vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CURE | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.04 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | -0.25 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | -0.49 | +3.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CURE vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, smaller than the maximum TSLL drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and TSLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CURE | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -82.88% | +13.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.10% | -54.75% | +23.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | -82.88% | +30.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.92% | -68.52% | +39.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.18% | -53.92% | +35.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.98% | 27.78% | -13.80% |
Volatility
CURE vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) is 15.41%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) has a volatility of 28.98%. This indicates that CURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CURE | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.41% | 28.98% | -13.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.09% | 56.84% | -25.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.49% | 89.07% | -44.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 106.91% | -62.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.58% | 106.91% | -57.33% |
CURE vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLL's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
CURE vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison
CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than TSLL's 8.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.19% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 8.21% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CURE and TSLL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLL has higher volatility (28.98%) compared to CURE (15.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs TSLL's -82.88%.
On 3-year performance, CURE leads with 1.46% vs -7.12% for TSLL. On fees, TSLL is cheaper at 0.83% per year. On volatility, CURE has been the lower-risk option at 15.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CURE has performed better with a 1.46% return vs -7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLL is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CURE.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 1.19% for CURE.
Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 0.83% for TSLL.
CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CURE and TSLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer