CURE vs. MUU
CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CURE tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. CURE charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
CURE vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CURE
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- 35.07%
- 3Y*
- 1.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CURE vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | -0.92% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CURE and MUU is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CURE vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
CURE
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CURE vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CURE | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CURE vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CURE | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -26.28% | -42.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.92% | -26.28% | -2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.18% | -10.19% | -7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.98% | — | — |
Volatility
CURE vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CURE | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.49% | 295.32% | -250.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 295.32% | -251.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.58% | 295.32% | -245.74% |
CURE vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
CURE vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.19% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CURE and MUU have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CURE.
CURE has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for CURE and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer