PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURE vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CURE vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -13.71% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.39% return.


CURE

1D
2.67%
1M
0.35%
YTD
-13.71%
6M
-14.70%
1Y
30.81%
3Y*
0.21%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
13.61%

IBIC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURE vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
-13.71%22.55%-8.47%4.93%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.39%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CURE and IBIC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURE vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURE
CURE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURE vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CUREIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

2.21

-1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

16.41

-15.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

58.11

-55.89

CURE vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURE and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CURE vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUREIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.19%

-0.90%

-68.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.10%

-0.27%

-30.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.51%

-0.11%

-31.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.18%

-0.10%

-18.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.94%

0.08%

+13.86%

Volatility

CURE vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a higher volatility of 15.11% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that CURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUREIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.11%

0.16%

+14.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.86%

0.67%

+30.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.43%

0.89%

+43.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.89%

1.57%

+42.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.63%

1.57%

+48.06%

CURE vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CURE vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
1.24%1.12%1.17%2.02%0.38%0.02%0.17%0.40%0.70%0.18%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CURE and IBIC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CURE has higher volatility (15.11%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, CURE leads with 30.81% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CURE has performed better with a 30.81% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CURE.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.24% for CURE.

CURE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CURE and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer