PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURE vs. BTAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CURE vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -20.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CURE has outperformed BTAL with an annualized return of 13.49%, while BTAL has yielded a comparatively lower -5.05% annualized return.


CURE

1D
-0.55%
1M
13.53%
YTD
-7.96%
6M
-6.00%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
13.49%

BTAL

1D
-0.09%
1M
-4.33%
YTD
-20.15%
6M
-19.27%
1Y
-36.60%
3Y*
-12.17%
5Y*
-4.94%
10Y*
-5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURE vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
-7.96%22.55%-8.47%-9.40%-20.51%88.30%5.02%55.66%2.82%69.32%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-20.15%-20.17%12.83%-15.11%20.48%-6.81%-13.86%1.07%15.13%-2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CURE and BTAL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2011

-0.26

The correlation between CURE and BTAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (all time) to -0.11 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CURE vs. BTAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CURE
BTAL

Healthcare

100.0%
10.2%

Basic Materials

-

4.0%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

4.4%

Financial Services

-

14.9%

Industrials

-

13.7%

Real Estate

-

6.2%

Technology

-

19.5%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Healthcare

CURE
100.0%
BTAL
10.2%

Basic Materials

CURE

-

BTAL
4.0%

Communication Services

CURE

-

BTAL
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CURE

-

BTAL
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

CURE

-

BTAL
5.6%

Energy

CURE

-

BTAL
4.4%

Financial Services

CURE

-

BTAL
14.9%

Industrials

CURE

-

BTAL
13.7%

Real Estate

CURE

-

BTAL
6.2%

Technology

CURE

-

BTAL
19.5%

Utilities

CURE

-

BTAL
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURE vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURE
CURE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURE vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CUREBTALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.73

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.98

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

-1.64

+3.58

CURE vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURE and BTAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CURE vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, which is greater than BTAL's maximum drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and BTAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUREBTALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.19%

-50.28%

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.10%

-37.50%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.93%

-45.16%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.23%

-45.16%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

-50.28%

-18.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.94%

-50.23%

+23.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-22.01%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.71%

22.38%

-8.67%

Volatility

CURE vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a higher volatility of 14.30% compared to AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) at 8.74%. This indicates that CURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUREBTALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.30%

8.74%

+5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.87%

16.58%

+14.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.32%

22.49%

+21.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.84%

18.96%

+24.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.59%

17.33%

+32.26%

CURE vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 2.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

CURE vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than BTAL's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
3.11%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%0.00%
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
1.16%1.12%1.17%2.02%0.38%0.02%0.17%0.40%0.70%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


CURE and BTAL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CURE has higher volatility (14.30%) compared to BTAL (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs BTAL's -50.28%.

On 10-year performance, CURE leads with 13.49% vs -5.05% for BTAL. On fees, CURE is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, BTAL has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CURE has performed better with a 13.49% return vs -5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CURE is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.

BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.16% for CURE.

CURE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTAL is Long-Short. CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while BTAL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and AGF. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 2.11% for BTAL.

CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CURE and BTAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer