PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CULAX vs. CAEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CULAX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CULAX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CULAX has underperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 2.46%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.


CULAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.57%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
2.46%

CAEIX

1D
-2.66%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
15.38%
6M
14.32%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CULAX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
1.24%4.55%5.69%6.07%-0.56%0.43%0.66%3.30%1.15%1.27%
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
15.38%32.61%-7.13%5.67%-17.43%6.73%61.52%33.48%-19.26%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CULAX and CAEIX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

0.12

The correlation between CULAX and CAEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CULAX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CULAX
CULAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CULAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CULAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CULAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CULAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CULAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CAEIX
CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CULAX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CULAXCAEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.78

1.38

+2.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.28

4.53

+8.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

54.11

14.31

+39.80

CULAX vs. CAEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CULAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the CAEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CULAX and CAEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CULAX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CULAX drawdown since its inception was -7.40%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CULAX and CAEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CULAXCAEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-75.81%

+68.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-8.39%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-24.57%

+24.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.19%

-32.58%

+30.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.40%

-37.54%

+30.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-6.28%

+6.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-48.50%

+48.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

2.65%

-2.58%

Volatility

CULAX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) is 0.36%, while Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that CULAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CULAXCAEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

7.11%

-6.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

14.15%

-13.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

17.40%

-16.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.35%

19.37%

-18.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.42%

19.61%

-18.19%

CULAX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CULAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CULAX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison

CULAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than CAEIX's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
0.62%0.72%1.17%1.07%0.86%0.49%0.82%1.23%2.00%1.40%1.79%0.72%
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
3.92%4.13%4.90%4.52%1.47%0.64%1.25%2.44%2.10%1.13%1.10%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


CULAX and CAEIX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAEIX has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to CULAX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CULAX dropped -7.40% vs CAEIX's -75.81%.

CULAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CULAX and CAEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer