CULAX vs. DFYGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CULAX (Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund) and DFYGX (DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, CULAX returned 2.46%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for DFYGX. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CULAX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DFYGX.

Performance

CULAX vs. DFYGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) and DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CULAX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than DFYGX's 1.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CULAX has outperformed DFYGX with an annualized return of 2.46%, while DFYGX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.42% annualized return.

CULAX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.34%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 4.10%
• 3Y*: 5.11%
• 5Y*: 3.38%
• 10Y*: 2.46%

DFYGX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 2.42%
• 3Y*: 3.84%
• 5Y*: 1.99%
• 10Y*: 1.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CULAX vs. DFYGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CULAX Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund	1.34%	4.55%	5.69%	6.07%	-0.56%	0.43%	0.66%	3.30%	1.15%	1.27%
DFYGX DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio	1.41%	2.16%	5.15%	5.00%	-3.02%	-0.51%	0.38%	2.20%	1.42%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CULAX and DFYGX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006	0.06

The correlation between CULAX and DFYGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CULAX vs. DFYGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CULAX

CULAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
CULAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CULAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CULAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CULAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CULAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

DFYGX

DFYGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
DFYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
DFYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DFYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DFYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DFYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CULAX vs. DFYGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) and DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CULAX	DFYGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.15	1.99	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.11	2.30	+8.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.07	2.25	+1.82
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.63	2.47	+11.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	55.94	8.81	+47.13

CULAX vs. DFYGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CULAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the DFYGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CULAX and DFYGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CULAX vs. DFYGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CULAX drawdown since its inception was -7.40%, which is greater than DFYGX's maximum drawdown of -4.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CULAX and DFYGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CULAX	DFYGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.40%	-4.46%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.30%	-1.04%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.30%	-1.04%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.19%	-4.36%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.40%	-4.46%	-2.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-0.30%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	0.29%	-0.22%

Volatility

CULAX vs. DFYGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) is 0.34%, while DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX) has a volatility of 0.37%. This indicates that CULAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFYGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CULAX	DFYGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	0.37%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.86%	0.60%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31%	1.29%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.35%	1.24%	+0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.42%	1.00%	+0.42%

CULAX vs. DFYGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CULAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than DFYGX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CULAX vs. DFYGX - Dividend Comparison

CULAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than DFYGX's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CULAX Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund	3.91%	4.13%	4.90%	4.52%	1.47%	0.64%	1.25%	2.44%	2.10%	1.13%	1.10%	0.66%
DFYGX DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio	2.80%	2.04%	4.84%	3.07%	1.14%	0.00%	0.27%	1.87%	1.82%	1.01%	0.58%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CULAX and DFYGX in my portfolio?

CULAX and DFYGX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CULAX or DFYGX?

DFYGX has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to CULAX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CULAX dropped -7.40% vs DFYGX's -4.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CULAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.