CTVA vs. ZTS
CTVA (Corteva, Inc.) and ZTS (Zoetis Inc.) are both stocks. CTVA operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while ZTS operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, CTVA returned 12.53%/yr vs -14.41%/yr for ZTS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTVA vs. ZTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTVA achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly higher than ZTS's -36.21% return.
CTVA
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- —
ZTS
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- -36.21%
- 6M
- -32.36%
- 1Y
- -50.83%
- 3Y*
- -20.79%
- 5Y*
- -14.41%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
CTVA vs. ZTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 14.11% | 18.89% | 20.24% | -17.51% | 25.58% | 23.55% | 33.49% | 0.32% |
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | -36.21% | -21.75% | -16.63% | 35.91% | -39.51% | 48.26% | 25.76% | 28.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTVA and ZTS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CTVA and ZTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CTVA:
$51.29B
ZTS:
$33.61B
CTVA:
$1.72
ZTS:
$6.04
CTVA:
44.37
ZTS:
13.17
CTVA:
2.88
ZTS:
3.66
CTVA:
2.11
ZTS:
10.40
CTVA:
$17.89B
ZTS:
$9.51B
CTVA:
$6.00B
ZTS:
$6.73B
CTVA:
$2.68B
ZTS:
$3.95B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTVA vs. ZTS — Risk / Return Rank
CTVA
ZTS
CTVA vs. ZTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) and Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTVA | ZTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.66 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | -0.97 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | -2.09 | +2.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTVA vs. ZTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTVA drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum ZTS drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTVA and ZTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTVA | ZTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.76% | -68.48% | +33.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.71% | -54.15% | +33.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.41% | -61.77% | +36.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.76% | -68.48% | +33.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.70% | -66.20% | +55.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.54% | -14.85% | +4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.61% | 26.53% | -16.92% |
Volatility
CTVA vs. ZTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) is 5.25%, while Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that CTVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTVA | ZTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 8.65% | -3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.43% | 31.45% | -16.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.28% | 35.73% | -12.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 28.77% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 27.10% | +5.55% |
Dividends
CTVA vs. ZTS - Dividend Comparison
CTVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than ZTS's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 0.95% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | 2.59% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 0.76% | 0.89% | 0.41% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 0.58% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Financials
CTVA vs. ZTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corteva, Inc. and Zoetis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTVA vs. ZTS - Profitability Comparison
CTVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ZTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.
CTVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported an operating income of 725.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.
ZTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported an operating income of 853.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.
CTVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a net income of 720.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
ZTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported a net income of 601.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTVA and ZTS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZTS has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to CTVA (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTVA dropped -34.76% vs ZTS's -68.48%.
CTVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTVA and ZTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer