CTVA vs. RS
CTVA (Corteva, Inc.) and RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — CTVA in Agricultural Inputs, RS in Steel. Over the past 5 years, CTVA returned 13.82%/yr vs 23.68%/yr for RS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTVA vs. RS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTVA achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 40.72% return.
CTVA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 18.19%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.82%
- 10Y*
- —
RS
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 40.72%
- 6M
- 37.56%
- 1Y
- 33.33%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 23.68%
- 10Y*
- 20.79%
CTVA vs. RS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 18.19% | 18.89% | 20.24% | -17.51% | 25.58% | 23.55% | 33.49% | 0.32% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 40.72% | 9.12% | -2.33% | 40.29% | 27.08% | 37.84% | 2.42% | 42.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTVA and RS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CTVA and RS has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CTVA:
$1.72
RS:
$14.01
CTVA:
45.95
RS:
28.80
CTVA:
2.99
RS:
1.49
CTVA:
$17.89B
RS:
$14.29B
CTVA:
$6.00B
RS:
$3.90B
CTVA:
$2.68B
RS:
$1.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTVA vs. RS — Risk / Return Rank
CTVA
RS
CTVA vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTVA | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 1.50 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 2.59 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTVA vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTVA drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum RS drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTVA and RS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTVA | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.76% | -83.80% | +49.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.71% | -22.30% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.69% | -22.30% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.76% | -22.32% | -12.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.51% | -2.40% | -5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -16.47% | +5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.70% | 12.90% | -3.20% |
Volatility
CTVA vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) is 5.13%, while Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that CTVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTVA | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 7.26% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.45% | 17.43% | -1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.30% | 25.70% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 27.87% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.62% | 29.69% | +2.93% |
Dividends
CTVA vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
CTVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than RS's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.21% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% |
Financials
CTVA vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corteva, Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTVA vs. RS - Profitability Comparison
CTVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 885.40M and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
CTVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported an operating income of 725.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.
RS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 176.20M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
CTVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a net income of 720.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
RS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTVA and RS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RS has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to CTVA (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTVA dropped -34.76% vs RS's -83.80%.
RS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTVA and RS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer