CTSIX vs. WISGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX).
CTSIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 23, 2011. WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013.
Performance
CTSIX vs. WISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CTSIX vs. WISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | -4.77% | 25.90% | 44.34% | 7.57% | -37.30% | 9.12% | 63.38% | 1.20% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | -2.24% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 8.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTSIX achieves a -4.77% return, which is significantly lower than WISGX's -2.24% return.
CTSIX
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- -4.77%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 36.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.96%
- 10Y*
- —
WISGX
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- -9.91%
- YTD
- -2.24%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CTSIX vs. WISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTSIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than WISGX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CTSIX vs. WISGX — Risk / Return Rank
CTSIX
WISGX
CTSIX vs. WISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTSIX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.70 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.13 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 1.02 | +1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | 3.98 | +6.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTSIX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.70 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.04 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.42 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between CTSIX and WISGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CTSIX vs. WISGX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CTSIX nor WISGX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.77% | 4.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
CTSIX vs. WISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTSIX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, which is greater than WISGX's maximum drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTSIX and WISGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTSIX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.83% | -43.22% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -14.26% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.60% | -43.22% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.38% | -12.48% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.13% | -12.69% | -8.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.66% | -0.46% |
Volatility
CTSIX vs. WISGX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) at 8.07%. This indicates that CTSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CTSIX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.38% | 8.07% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.14% | 14.92% | +6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.23% | 24.02% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.79% | 24.39% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 23.89% | +5.80% |