CTS vs. WMT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CTS Corporation (CTS) and Walmart Inc. (WMT).

Performance

CTS vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CTS Corporation (CTS) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTS vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTS CTS Corporation	11.50%	-18.39%	20.95%	11.38%	7.80%	7.46%	15.18%	16.53%	1.08%	15.75%
WMT Walmart Inc.	11.78%	24.49%	73.99%	12.88%	-0.46%	1.97%	23.32%	30.16%	-3.43%	46.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CTS : $1.40B WMT : $995.36B
EPS CTS : $2.19 WMT : $2.73
PE Ratio CTS : 21.79 WMT : 45.54
PEG Ratio CTS : 0.94 WMT : 2.97
PS Ratio CTS : 2.63 WMT : 1.40
PB Ratio CTS : 2.53 WMT : 9.99
Total Revenue (TTM) CTS : $541.59M WMT : $713.16B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTS : $207.98M WMT : $177.77B
EBITDA (TTM) CTS : $120.37M WMT : $48.50B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CTS having a 11.50% return and WMT slightly higher at 11.78%. Over the past 10 years, CTS has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 12.21%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.48% annualized return.

CTS

• 1D: 2.40%
• 1M: -9.23%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 6M: 19.79%
• 1Y: 15.37%
• 3Y*: -0.81%
• 5Y*: 8.99%
• 10Y*: 12.21%

WMT

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.67%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 21.08%
• 1Y: 42.82%
• 3Y*: 37.81%
• 5Y*: 24.04%
• 10Y*: 20.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CTS vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTS

CTS Risk / Return Rank: 55
CTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CTS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CTS Martin Ratio Rank: 59

WMT

WMT Risk / Return Rank: 90
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTS vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTS Corporation (CTS) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTS	WMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	1.78	-1.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	2.72	-1.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.34	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	4.33	-3.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.69	11.97	-10.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTS vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTS Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTS and WMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTS	WMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	1.78	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	1.15	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.95	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.64	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between CTS and WMT is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CTS vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

CTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than WMT's 0.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTS CTS Corporation	0.34%	0.37%	0.30%	0.37%	0.41%	0.44%	0.47%	0.53%	0.62%	0.62%	0.71%	0.91%
WMT Walmart Inc.	0.77%	0.84%	0.92%	1.45%	1.58%	1.52%	1.50%	1.78%	2.23%	2.07%	2.89%	3.20%

Drawdowns

CTS vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTS drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTS and WMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTS	WMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.23%	-77.14%	-20.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.31%	-10.92%	-9.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.62%	-25.74%	-14.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.59%	-25.74%	-26.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.84%	-6.99%	-22.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.64%	-14.66%	-35.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.11%	3.95%	+4.16%

Volatility

CTS vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

CTS Corporation (CTS) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 5.96%. This indicates that CTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTS	WMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.81%	5.96%	+5.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.21%	17.03%	+7.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.17%	24.35%	+10.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.51%	21.09%	+12.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.80%	21.70%	+13.10%

Financials

CTS vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CTS Corporation and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CTS Corporation reported a gross profit of 53.71M and revenue of 137.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.04B and revenue of 190.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.7%.

CTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CTS Corporation reported an operating income of 23.10M and revenue of 137.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 8.71B and revenue of 190.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

CTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CTS Corporation reported a net income of 19.74M and revenue of 137.27M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 4.24B and revenue of 190.66B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.