PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTS vs. KN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CTS vs. KN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CTS Corporation (CTS) and Knowles Corporation (KN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTS achieves a 56.51% return, which is significantly lower than KN's 80.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CTS has outperformed KN with an annualized return of 14.40%, while KN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.


CTS

1D
0.48%
1M
18.59%
YTD
56.51%
6M
48.80%
1Y
61.36%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
14.40%

KN

1D
-1.33%
1M
21.17%
YTD
80.54%
6M
68.07%
1Y
132.65%
3Y*
30.45%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTS vs. KN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTS
CTS Corporation
56.51%-18.39%20.95%11.38%7.80%7.46%15.18%16.53%1.08%15.75%
KN
Knowles Corporation
80.54%7.53%11.28%9.07%-29.68%26.70%-12.86%58.90%-9.21%-12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CTS and KN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

0.50

The correlation between CTS and KN shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CTS:

$2.34

KN:

$0.70

PE Ratio

CTS:

28.70

KN:

54.89

PEG Ratio

CTS:

1.24

KN:

0.05

PS Ratio

CTS:

3.58

KN:

5.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTS:

$555.01M

KN:

$461.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTS:

$217.01M

KN:

$261.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

CTS:

$119.07M

KN:

$143.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTS vs. KN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTS
CTS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

KN
KN Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
KN Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KN Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTS vs. KN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTS Corporation (CTS) and Knowles Corporation (KN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTSKNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

3.94

-2.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

4.60

-2.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.57

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

8.71

-5.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.84

23.99

-16.15

CTS vs. KN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the KN Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTS and KN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTSKNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

3.94

-2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.42

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.28

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.07

+0.16

Drawdowns

CTS vs. KN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTS drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than KN's maximum drawdown of -70.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTS and KN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTSKNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.23%

-70.24%

-26.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.31%

-15.32%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.62%

-38.00%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.62%

-49.55%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.59%

-49.55%

-3.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-1.33%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.48%

-45.04%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.85%

5.55%

+2.30%

Volatility

CTS vs. KN - Volatility Comparison

CTS Corporation (CTS) has a higher volatility of 12.61% compared to Knowles Corporation (KN) at 11.79%. This indicates that CTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTSKNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.61%

11.79%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.37%

25.73%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.14%

33.90%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.42%

32.85%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.89%

34.44%

+0.45%

Dividends

CTS vs. KN - Dividend Comparison

CTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while KN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTS
CTS Corporation
0.24%0.37%0.30%0.37%0.41%0.44%0.47%0.53%0.62%0.62%0.71%0.91%
KN
Knowles Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CTS vs. KN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CTS Corporation and Knowles Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
139.23M
0
(CTS) Total Revenue
(KN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CTS and KN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTS has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to KN (11.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTS dropped -97.23% vs KN's -70.24%.

KN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTS and KN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer