CTS vs. RSG
CTS (CTS Corporation) and RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) are both stocks. CTS operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while RSG operates in Waste Management (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CTS returned 14.40%/yr vs 17.30%/yr for RSG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTS vs. RSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTS achieves a 56.51% return, which is significantly higher than RSG's -3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CTS has underperformed RSG with an annualized return of 14.40%, while RSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.30% annualized return.
CTS
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 18.59%
- YTD
- 56.51%
- 6M
- 48.80%
- 1Y
- 61.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
RSG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- -4.64%
- 1Y
- -19.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- 17.30%
CTS vs. RSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTS CTS Corporation | 56.51% | -18.39% | 20.95% | 11.38% | 7.80% | 7.46% | 15.18% | 16.53% | 1.08% | 15.75% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | -3.09% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTS and RSG is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1998 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CTS and RSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CTS:
$1.94B
RSG:
$63.12B
CTS:
$2.34
RSG:
$6.98
CTS:
28.70
RSG:
29.26
CTS:
1.24
RSG:
2.06
CTS:
3.58
RSG:
3.80
CTS:
1.75
RSG:
5.27
CTS:
$555.01M
RSG:
$16.70B
CTS:
$217.01M
RSG:
$3.80B
CTS:
$119.07M
RSG:
$4.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTS vs. RSG — Risk / Return Rank
CTS
RSG
CTS vs. RSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTS Corporation (CTS) and Republic Services, Inc. (RSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTS | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.83 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | -0.92 | +3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | -1.51 | +9.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTS | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | -1.08 | +2.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.82 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.91 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.39 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
CTS vs. RSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTS drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than RSG's maximum drawdown of -65.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTS and RSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTS | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -65.99% | -31.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.31% | -21.34% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.62% | -22.54% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.62% | -22.54% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.59% | -34.02% | -18.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -20.01% | +18.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.48% | -11.83% | -38.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.85% | 13.65% | -5.80% |
Volatility
CTS vs. RSG - Volatility Comparison
CTS Corporation (CTS) has a higher volatility of 12.61% compared to Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) at 6.59%. This indicates that CTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTS | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.61% | 6.59% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.37% | 13.23% | +11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.14% | 18.10% | +15.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.42% | 18.06% | +15.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.89% | 19.03% | +15.86% |
Dividends
CTS vs. RSG - Dividend Comparison
CTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than RSG's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTS CTS Corporation | 0.24% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.44% | 0.47% | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.91% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.20% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
Financials
CTS vs. RSG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CTS Corporation and Republic Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTS vs. RSG - Profitability Comparison
CTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTS Corporation reported a gross profit of 54.99M and revenue of 139.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.5%.
RSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTS Corporation reported an operating income of 21.98M and revenue of 139.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.
RSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
CTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTS Corporation reported a net income of 17.20M and revenue of 139.23M, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
RSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTS and RSG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTS has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to RSG (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTS dropped -97.23% vs RSG's -65.99%.
CTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTS and RSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer