CTS vs. BELFB
CTS (CTS Corporation) and BELFB (Bel Fuse Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Electronic Components industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, CTS returned 14.40%/yr vs 33.14%/yr for BELFB. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTS vs. BELFB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTS achieves a 56.51% return, which is significantly lower than BELFB's 65.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CTS has underperformed BELFB with an annualized return of 14.40%, while BELFB has yielded a comparatively higher 33.14% annualized return.
CTS
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 18.59%
- YTD
- 56.51%
- 6M
- 48.80%
- 1Y
- 61.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
BELFB
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- 65.23%
- 6M
- 75.46%
- 1Y
- 283.18%
- 3Y*
- 75.24%
- 5Y*
- 81.90%
- 10Y*
- 33.14%
CTS vs. BELFB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTS CTS Corporation | 56.51% | -18.39% | 20.95% | 11.38% | 7.80% | 7.46% | 15.18% | 16.53% | 1.08% | 15.75% |
BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 65.23% | 106.32% | 24.03% | 104.19% | 158.73% | -12.33% | -24.84% | 13.09% | -25.89% | -17.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTS and BELFB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 1998 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
CTS:
$1.94B
BELFB:
$592.39M
CTS:
$2.34
BELFB:
$7.60
CTS:
28.70
BELFB:
36.84
CTS:
1.24
BELFB:
0.89
CTS:
3.58
BELFB:
2.89
CTS:
1.75
BELFB:
0.62
CTS:
$555.01M
BELFB:
$701.71M
CTS:
$217.01M
BELFB:
$275.20M
CTS:
$119.07M
BELFB:
$135.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTS vs. BELFB — Risk / Return Rank
CTS
BELFB
CTS vs. BELFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTS Corporation (CTS) and Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTS | BELFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 5.94 | -4.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 4.80 | -2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.67 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 14.60 | -11.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 43.30 | -35.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTS | BELFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 5.94 | -4.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 1.60 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.57 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.26 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
CTS vs. BELFB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTS drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than BELFB's maximum drawdown of -81.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTS and BELFB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTS | BELFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -81.89% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.31% | -19.54% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.62% | -36.49% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.62% | -36.49% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.59% | -79.79% | +27.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -7.48% | +5.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.48% | -36.89% | -13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.85% | 6.57% | +1.28% |
Volatility
CTS vs. BELFB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CTS Corporation (CTS) is 12.61%, while Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) has a volatility of 16.00%. This indicates that CTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BELFB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTS | BELFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.61% | 16.00% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.37% | 35.22% | -10.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.14% | 48.03% | -14.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.42% | 51.48% | -18.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.89% | 58.32% | -23.43% |
Dividends
CTS vs. BELFB - Dividend Comparison
CTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, more than BELFB's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.34% | 0.42% | 0.85% | 2.17% | 1.86% | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 0.91% | 1.62% |
CTS CTS Corporation | 0.24% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.44% | 0.47% | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.91% |
Financials
CTS vs. BELFB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CTS Corporation and Bel Fuse Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTS vs. BELFB - Profitability Comparison
CTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTS Corporation reported a gross profit of 54.99M and revenue of 139.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.5%.
BELFB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.60M and revenue of 178.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.
CTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTS Corporation reported an operating income of 21.98M and revenue of 139.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.
BELFB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported an operating income of 23.67M and revenue of 178.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.
CTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTS Corporation reported a net income of 17.20M and revenue of 139.23M, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
BELFB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a net income of 11.38M and revenue of 178.49M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTS and BELFB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BELFB has higher volatility (16.00%) compared to CTS (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTS dropped -97.23% vs BELFB's -81.89%.
BELFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTS and BELFB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer