PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTRZX vs. MUSEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTRZX vs. MUSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRZX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than MUSEX's 10.98% return.


CTRZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.36%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*

MUSEX

1D
0.05%
1M
4.86%
YTD
10.98%
6M
11.81%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
22.60%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
14.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTRZX vs. MUSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTRZX
Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund
0.41%7.48%2.03%5.78%-14.46%-0.95%8.47%9.07%-0.96%3.79%
MUSEX
MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund
10.98%16.10%25.17%28.30%-16.02%29.24%15.47%28.80%-7.82%16.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CTRZX and MUSEX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.01

Over the past year, CTRZX and MUSEX have become more correlated (0.23) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTRZX vs. MUSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTRZX
CTRZX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CTRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CTRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MUSEX
MUSEX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MUSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTRZX vs. MUSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTRZXMUSEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.21

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

14.30

-8.66

CTRZX vs. MUSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTRZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the MUSEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRZX and MUSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTRZXMUSEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.27

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.85

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.53

-0.14

Drawdowns

CTRZX vs. MUSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRZX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum MUSEX drawdown of -54.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRZX and MUSEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTRZXMUSEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-54.78%

+35.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-8.60%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.14%

-19.18%

+13.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

-21.87%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

0.00%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-10.59%

+5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.93%

-0.92%

Volatility

CTRZX vs. MUSEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) is 1.44%, while MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that CTRZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTRZXMUSEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

2.58%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

9.29%

-6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

12.18%

-8.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

17.03%

-11.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.11%

18.32%

-13.21%

CTRZX vs. MUSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CTRZX and MUSEX have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

CTRZX vs. MUSEX - Dividend Comparison

CTRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than MUSEX's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTRZX
Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund
4.40%4.39%4.61%3.47%2.70%2.13%4.69%3.32%2.89%2.22%0.00%0.00%
MUSEX
MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund
6.45%7.15%10.44%3.91%9.26%16.18%7.12%5.19%11.98%2.04%1.20%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTRZX and MUSEX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUSEX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to CTRZX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTRZX dropped -19.33% vs MUSEX's -54.78%.

MUSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTRZX and MUSEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer