PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTRZX vs. AMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTRZX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRZX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than AMFIX's 0.30% return.


CTRZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.36%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*

AMFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.48%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTRZX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTRZX
Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund
0.41%7.48%2.03%5.78%-14.46%-0.95%8.47%9.07%-0.96%0.21%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.30%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%2.47%0.89%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CTRZX and AMFIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2017

0.79

The correlation between CTRZX and AMFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTRZX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTRZX
CTRZX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CTRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CTRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTRZX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTRZXAMFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

2.43

-1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

3.81

-1.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.51

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.43

-1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

11.54

-5.90

CTRZX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTRZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRZX and AMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTRZXAMFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.43

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.35

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.56

-0.17

Drawdowns

CTRZX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRZX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRZX and AMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTRZXAMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-9.35%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-0.74%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.14%

-0.88%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

-8.91%

-10.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-0.39%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-2.03%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.22%

+0.79%

Volatility

CTRZX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.41%. This indicates that CTRZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTRZXAMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

0.41%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

0.83%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

1.04%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

2.17%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.11%

1.74%

+3.37%

CTRZX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTRZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTRZX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

CTRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than AMFIX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.21%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%
CTRZX
Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund
4.40%4.39%4.61%3.47%2.70%2.13%4.69%3.32%2.89%2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTRZX and AMFIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTRZX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to AMFIX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTRZX dropped -19.33% vs AMFIX's -9.35%.

AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTRZX and AMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer