CTRA vs. EPD

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CTRA (Coterra Energy Inc.) and EPD (Enterprise Products Partners L.P.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — CTRA in Oil & Gas E&P, EPD in Oil & Gas Midstream. Over the past 10 years, CTRA returned 6.42%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for EPD. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CTRA vs. EPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRA achieves a 24.61% return, which is significantly higher than EPD's 21.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CTRA has underperformed EPD with an annualized return of 6.42%, while EPD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.

CTRA

• 1D: -8.62%
• 1M: -7.97%
• YTD: 24.61%
• 6M: 24.28%
• 1Y: 33.09%
• 3Y*: 12.65%
• 5Y*: 19.04%
• 10Y*: 6.42%

EPD

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 21.27%
• 6M: 21.54%
• 1Y: 29.66%
• 3Y*: 21.47%
• 5Y*: 17.41%
• 10Y*: 10.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTRA vs. EPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc.	24.61%	6.68%	3.38%	8.72%	39.15%	23.50%	-4.33%	-20.78%	-21.07%	23.26%
EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P.	21.27%	9.45%	28.00%	17.71%	18.32%	21.40%	-23.61%	21.88%	-1.32%	4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CTRA and EPD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1998	0.34

The correlation between CTRA and EPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CTRA : $24.84B EPD : $82.47B
EPS CTRA : $2.19 EPD : $2.69
PE Ratio CTRA : 14.88 EPD : 14.00
PEG Ratio CTRA : 0.71 EPD : 2.25
PS Ratio CTRA : 3.83 EPD : 1.60
Total Revenue (TTM) CTRA : $6.48B EPD : $51.57B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTRA : $2.63B EPD : $7.31B
EBITDA (TTM) CTRA : $4.83B EPD : $10.11B

Return for Risk

CTRA vs. EPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTRA

CTRA Risk / Return Rank: 77
CTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

EPD

EPD Risk / Return Rank: 86
EPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EPD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EPD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTRA vs. EPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTRA	EPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.87	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.64	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.33	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	4.05	-1.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	12.67	-8.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTRA vs. EPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the EPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRA and EPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTRA	EPD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	1.87	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	1.02	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.43	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.54	-0.27

Drawdowns

CTRA vs. EPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRA drawdown since its inception was -74.41%, which is greater than EPD's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRA and EPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTRA	EPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.41%	-58.78%	-15.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.51%	-7.56%	-7.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.62%	-15.40%	-8.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.25%	-18.06%	-15.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.56%	-58.04%	+5.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.33%	-5.25%	-5.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.96%	-10.13%	-16.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.38%	2.42%	+4.96%

Volatility

CTRA vs. EPD - Volatility Comparison

Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) at 6.74%. This indicates that CTRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTRA	EPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.41%	6.74%	+6.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.40%	13.29%	+10.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.69%	15.98%	+14.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.49%	17.23%	+17.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.56%	24.16%	+11.40%

Dividends

CTRA vs. EPD - Dividend Comparison

CTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than EPD's 5.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc.	2.03%	3.34%	3.29%	4.58%	8.47%	5.89%	2.46%	2.01%	1.12%	0.59%	0.34%	0.45%
EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P.	5.81%	6.74%	6.63%	7.51%	7.79%	8.20%	9.09%	6.23%	6.97%	6.29%	5.88%	5.90%

Financials

CTRA vs. EPD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coterra Energy Inc. and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CTRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 876.00M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.6%.

EPD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 14.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.

CTRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 646.00M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.5%.

EPD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 1.82B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

CTRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a net income of 466.00M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 40.8%.

EPD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTRA and EPD in my portfolio?

CTRA and EPD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTRA or EPD?

CTRA has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to EPD (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTRA dropped -74.41% vs EPD's -58.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.